12.9 sec in total
658 ms
11.5 sec
701 ms
Visit naschblog.de now to see the best up-to-date Naschblog content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about naschblog.de
Maßgeschneiderte IT Lösungen aus einer Hand.Informieren Sie sich hier, warum Sie bei Ihrem IT-Vorhaben durch eine Zusammenarbeit mit uns auf der richtigen Seite sind.
Visit naschblog.deWe analyzed Naschblog.de page load time and found that the first response time was 658 ms and then it took 12.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
naschblog.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value29.8 s
0/100
25%
Value50.4 s
0/100
10%
Value30,630 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.761
5/100
15%
Value52.1 s
0/100
10%
658 ms
1035 ms
279 ms
189 ms
190 ms
Our browser made a total of 116 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 31% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Naschblog.de, 18% (21 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com and 9% (10 requests) were made to Api.pinterest.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Naschblog.de.
Page size can be reduced by 589.8 kB (50%)
1.2 MB
585.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Naschblog.de main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 563.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Naschblog images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 382.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 382.8 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 127.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Naschblog.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 127.9 kB or 69% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 74 (70%)
105
31
The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Naschblog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
naschblog.de
658 ms
www.naschblog.de
1035 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
279 ms
styles.css
189 ms
pagenavi-css.css
190 ms
css
58 ms
genericons.css
282 ms
style.css
377 ms
wpp.css
284 ms
jetpack.css
468 ms
jquery.js
483 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
369 ms
jquery.form.min.js
171 ms
scripts.js
185 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
12 ms
gprofiles.js
60 ms
wpgroho.js
254 ms
masonry.min.js
370 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
274 ms
functions.js
274 ms
wp-embed.min.js
350 ms
postmessage.js
367 ms
jquery.jetpack-resize.js
366 ms
jquery.inview.js
369 ms
queuehandler.js
378 ms
sharing.js
436 ms
e-201611.js
4 ms
nasch-header.png
375 ms
search-icon.png
349 ms
B%C3%BCcher-falten-schneiden02-150x150.jpg
357 ms
B%C3%BCcher-falten-schneiden04-150x150.jpg
356 ms
B%C3%BCcher-falten-schneiden03-150x150.jpg
355 ms
B%C3%BCcher-falten-4-300x225.jpg
355 ms
snappap.png
356 ms
12von12-fotos.jpg
475 ms
Kreatives-Sonntags-R%C3%A4tsel-201x300.jpg
9443 ms
naschblog-plotter-sketchpens-1-300x300.jpg
597 ms
naschblog-plotter-sketchpens-2-300x300.jpg
554 ms
orimoto.jpg
453 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlFzCdIATDt8zXO3QNtzVeJ8.ttf
50 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGEBls_1aQwi4AfipSOlE3SU.ttf
58 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGGAlZ1PukdtTN2z-JxSzbe8.ttf
56 ms
x-sAbYHwdJCKPJ06aP6Wqw.ttf
58 ms
JGVZEP92dXgoQBG1CnQcfKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
59 ms
Genericons.svg
522 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
7 ms
M2Jd71oPJhLKp0zdtTvoM6xot8ENfkYez2Lz7rcrw70.ttf
59 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6I48KljrVa8Zcyi9xGGohEU.ttf
58 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6KQ4IK8jcFikBX2R8jKe4LU.ttf
96 ms
likebox.php
375 ms
master.html
213 ms
1f61b.png
187 ms
hovercard.css
65 ms
services.css
97 ms
count.json
71 ms
g.gif
39 ms
graph.facebook.com
210 ms
count.json
70 ms
graph.facebook.com
9122 ms
count.json
66 ms
graph.facebook.com
322 ms
count.json
62 ms
graph.facebook.com
9120 ms
count.json
62 ms
graph.facebook.com
9118 ms
count.json
57 ms
graph.facebook.com
9122 ms
count.json
90 ms
graph.facebook.com
9116 ms
count.json
90 ms
graph.facebook.com
9120 ms
count.json
90 ms
graph.facebook.com
9120 ms
count.json
88 ms
graph.facebook.com
9119 ms
g.gif
22 ms
g.gif
22 ms
g.gif
22 ms
g.gif
22 ms
g.gif
22 ms
g.gif
23 ms
g.gif
23 ms
g.gif
33 ms
g.gif
33 ms
g.gif
32 ms
g.gif
32 ms
g.gif
33 ms
g.gif
32 ms
g.gif
34 ms
g.gif
33 ms
g.gif
34 ms
g.gif
33 ms
g.gif
33 ms
g.gif
33 ms
1f600.png
85 ms
g.gif
32 ms
jquery.js
10 ms
postmessage.js
2 ms
jed.js
5 ms
underscore.min.js
4 ms
kyEKgjk51ZE.css
108 ms
xgj7bXhJNEH.css
126 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
165 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
198 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
188 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
187 ms
jquery.wpcom-proxy-request.js
4 ms
39 ms
33 ms
likes-rest.js
13 ms
6 ms
batch
8851 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
46 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
46 ms
noticons.css
10 ms
style.css
9 ms
naschblog.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
naschblog.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
naschblog.de SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Naschblog.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Naschblog.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
naschblog.de
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Naschblog. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: