Tools & Wizards About Us
nashlift.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 48

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

nashlift.com

Nash Lift | Forklift Parts | Lift Truck Parts | Clark Parts | Caterpillar Parts | Hyster Parts | Yale Parts | Baker-Linde Parts | Barrett Parts | Big ...

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

440 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.6 sec

nashlift.com screenshot

About Website

Visit nashlift.com now to see the best up-to-date Nash Lift content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nashlift.com

Forklift Parts, Lift Truck Parts, Clark Parts, Caterpillar Parts, Hyster Parts, Yale Parts, Baker-Linde Parts, Barrett Parts, Big Joe Parts, Blue Giant Parts, Bobcat Parts, Cascade Parts, Crown Parts,...

Visit nashlift.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nashlift.com page load time and found that the first response time was 440 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nashlift.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value530 ms

55/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.nashlift.com

440 ms

grid.css

66 ms

style.css

162 ms

camera.css

71 ms

_parallax.css

70 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Nashlift.com, 9% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (440 ms) belongs to the original domain Nashlift.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 648.4 kB (33%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Nashlift.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 93.1 kB

  • Original 107.8 kB
  • After minification 83.3 kB
  • After compression 14.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 24.4 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 61.1 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nash Lift images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 320.6 kB

  • Original 488.8 kB
  • After minification 371.3 kB
  • After compression 168.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 320.6 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 173.6 kB

  • Original 195.8 kB
  • After minification 151.7 kB
  • After compression 22.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nashlift.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 173.6 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (71%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nash Lift. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.nashlift.com

www.nashlift.com

440 ms

grid.css

grid.css

66 ms

style.css

style.css

162 ms

camera.css

camera.css

71 ms

_parallax.css

_parallax.css

70 ms

google-map.css

google-map.css

69 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

99 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

139 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

205 ms

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.js

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.js

106 ms

device.min.js

device.min.js

127 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

160 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

175 ms

jquery.number.js

jquery.number.js

166 ms

cookies.js

cookies.js

173 ms

script.js

script.js

101 ms

script2.js

script2.js

102 ms

animate.css

animate.css

36 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

15 ms

css

css

23 ms

embed

embed

213 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

88 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

87 ms

tmstickup.js

tmstickup.js

87 ms

jquery.ui.totop.js

jquery.ui.totop.js

87 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

86 ms

jquery.simplr.smoothscroll.min.js

jquery.simplr.smoothscroll.min.js

86 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

123 ms

jquery.rd-navbar.js

jquery.rd-navbar.js

125 ms

jquery.mobile.customized.min.js

jquery.mobile.customized.min.js

125 ms

camera.js

camera.js

205 ms

jquery.rd-parallax.js

jquery.rd-parallax.js

120 ms

logo.png

logo.png

202 ms

tr.png

tr.png

203 ms

noimage.png

noimage.png

204 ms

nashfuellogo.png

nashfuellogo.png

207 ms

surplusforkliftparts.jpg

surplusforkliftparts.jpg

312 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

16 ms

js

js

121 ms

camera-loader.gif

camera-loader.gif

36 ms

slide1.jpg

slide1.jpg

68 ms

propanekit.jpg

propanekit.jpg

92 ms

forklift.jpg

forklift.jpg

90 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

4 ms

search.js

search.js

7 ms

main.js

main.js

13 ms

slide1.jpg

slide1.jpg

66 ms

Accessibility Review

nashlift.com accessibility score

48

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

nashlift.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

nashlift.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nashlift.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nashlift.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

nashlift.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nash Lift. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: