3.2 sec in total
181 ms
3 sec
62 ms
Welcome to nashtracks.com homepage info - get ready to check Nash Tracks best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about nashtracks.com
Your Songs, Nashville Players
Visit nashtracks.comWe analyzed Nashtracks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 181 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
nashtracks.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value5.2 s
22/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value280 ms
81/100
30%
Value0.19
64/100
15%
Value5.9 s
66/100
10%
181 ms
172 ms
1990 ms
79 ms
156 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Nashtracks.com, 9% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Nashtracks.com.
Page size can be reduced by 144.7 kB (46%)
315.7 kB
171.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Nashtracks.com main page is 315.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 163.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Nash Tracks needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 27% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 31.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 31.0 kB or 28% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 83.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nashtracks.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 83.4 kB or 51% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (90%)
29
3
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nash Tracks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
nashtracks.com
181 ms
www.nashtracks.com
172 ms
www.nashtracks.com
1990 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
79 ms
style.css
156 ms
style.min.css
303 ms
classic-themes.min.css
228 ms
sc_our_team.css
230 ms
testimonial-rotator-style.css
232 ms
font-awesome.min.css
44 ms
dashicons.min.css
307 ms
css
42 ms
style.css
232 ms
jetpack.css
379 ms
jquery.min.js
389 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
308 ms
hc.js
308 ms
carousel.js
377 ms
sc_our_team.js
404 ms
jquery.cycletwo.js
406 ms
jquery.cycletwo.addons.js
405 ms
responsive-menu.js
455 ms
svgxuse.js
456 ms
font-awesome.min.css
47 ms
form.css
487 ms
main.js
489 ms
main.min.js
490 ms
e-202440.js
28 ms
nashtracks_logo1.png
78 ms
Qw3GZR9MED_6PSuS_50nEaVrfzgEbHoEig.ttf
43 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
63 ms
r05XGLJT86YzEZ7o.ttf
106 ms
frontend.min.css
81 ms
action-bar.min.css
81 ms
icegram.min.js
94 ms
nashtracks.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
nashtracks.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
nashtracks.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nashtracks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nashtracks.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nashtracks.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nash Tracks. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: