3.5 sec in total
330 ms
2.1 sec
1 sec
Welcome to nasne.com homepage info - get ready to check Nasne best content right away, or after learning these important things about nasne.com
プレイステーションの公式サイトです。ネットワークレコーダー&メディアストレージ「nasne(ナスネ)」の情報をお伝えしています。
Visit nasne.comWe analyzed Nasne.com page load time and found that the first response time was 330 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
nasne.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.7 s
0/100
10%
Value16.6 s
0/100
25%
Value14.3 s
1/100
10%
Value8,550 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value33.6 s
0/100
10%
330 ms
72 ms
75 ms
164 ms
151 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Nasne.com, 17% (12 requests) were made to Playstation.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Assets.adobedtm.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (330 ms) relates to the external source Playstation.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (63%)
2.0 MB
757.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Nasne.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 972.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 184.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 28.4 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 184.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 844 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Nasne needs image optimization as it can save up to 844 B or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 351.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 351.0 kB or 36% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 737.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nasne.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 737.8 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (89%)
28
3
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nasne. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
330 ms
font-all.css
72 ms
font-sst-condensed.css
75 ms
pdc.vendor.min.e27777d91e92e42cfdf8903e943a3d10.css
164 ms
clientlibs-jetstream.min.2ea1914f4df331a6973fe678d3dbef51.css
151 ms
pdc.designkit.min.5659ee16a0f92a4a90c00b49fd50ddbd.css
286 ms
pdc.jquery.min.cf2fbbf84281d9ecbffb4993203d543b.js
133 ms
pdc.prelaunch.min.71a0e0af97ddc13d34cc0b1c611bc644.js
146 ms
launch-c1f03f5b4bc6.min.js
58 ms
pdc.vendor.min.9d575e40b47d6eb3bca7a7f99a1a5bb5.js
160 ms
clientlibs-inaemvendor.min.d4f3a73ec26bc58fabfbfd7f152bf9a1.js
203 ms
psw-styles.css
75 ms
common.71776dadf4896b1dddec.js
94 ms
ui-components.ad9a3afbabc20c95092f.js
81 ms
main.2a0c9db1906a6070755a.js
74 ms
network.6ac3ea3725a3ae8714c0.js
89 ms
telemetry.5e22f8ce3db5b9e78943.js
100 ms
ui-framework.2d527adbdd67209cd992.js
80 ms
pdc.preload.min.9241934c086c22ba354e49cc9e8c0ef6.js
183 ms
clientlibs-jetstream.16fae63b999a8f390141f77e7bac1ad9.js
206 ms
pdc.designkit.min.ce27dc05aa33f73d04aea49b251a7ae7.js
193 ms
sbsd
184 ms
psw-base.d38a8.css
21 ms
psw-layout.6c39f.css
9 ms
psw-grid.7c02c.css
83 ms
psw-components.b1c24.css
28 ms
psw-dig20.ce075.css
60 ms
loader-spinner-dark
251 ms
SST-Medium-latin.1a420.woff
48 ms
SST-Medium-latin-ext.43581.woff
49 ms
SST-Medium-greek.32fea.woff
51 ms
SST-Medium-cyrillic.7baac.woff
18 ms
SST-Medium-Vietnamese.09df7.woff
47 ms
SST-Medium-Thai.677e3.woff
51 ms
SST-Medium-Arabic.9fba4.woff
49 ms
SST-Roman-latin.ba006.woff
51 ms
SST-Roman-latin-ext.2ab2e.woff
52 ms
SST-Roman-greek.1965e.woff
51 ms
SST-Roman-cyrillic.d4271.woff
53 ms
SST-Roman-Vietnamese.43bb6.woff
119 ms
SST-Roman-Thai.4294d.woff
122 ms
SST-Roman-Arabic.f67d7.woff
114 ms
SST-Regular-Pro-Jp.2e5da.woff
125 ms
SST-Light-latin.1291e.woff
112 ms
SST-Light-latin-ext.e9b91.woff
114 ms
SST-Light-greek.5b4ad.woff
115 ms
SST-Light-cyrillic.9664c.woff
117 ms
SST-Light-Vietnamese.50e48.woff
116 ms
SST-Light-Thai.ed554.woff
115 ms
SST-Light-Pro-Jp.f3ed6.woff
151 ms
SST-Light-Arabic.75c1c.woff
118 ms
SST-UltraLight-latin.6f31a.woff
119 ms
SST-UltraLight-latin-ext.420a0.woff
120 ms
SST-UltraLight-greek.3d354.woff
123 ms
SST-UltraLight-cyrillic.44759.woff
123 ms
SST-UltraLight-Pro-Jp.ef7e9.woff
256 ms
SST-Bold-latin.5afa0.woff
151 ms
SST-Bold-latin-ext.f85b5.woff
152 ms
SST-Bold-greek.38445.woff
147 ms
SST-Bold-cyrillic.ddf7f.woff
146 ms
SST-Bold-Vietnamese.af099.woff
151 ms
SST-Bold-Thai.0f06a.woff
257 ms
SST-Bold-Pro-Jp.5e882.woff
253 ms
SST-Bold-Arabic.87967.woff
249 ms
SST-Heavy-latin.513f3.woff
216 ms
SST-Heavy-latin-ext.32511.woff
212 ms
SST-Heavy-greek.588af.woff
232 ms
SST-Heavy-cyrillic.230d0.woff
214 ms
M
23 ms
nasne.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
nasne.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
nasne.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nasne.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nasne.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nasne.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nasne. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: