Tools & Wizards About Us
natemat.pl screenshot

Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

natemat.pl

naTemat.pl - informacje i opinie, którymi żyją Polacy

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

658 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

76 ms

natemat.pl screenshot

About Website

Welcome to natemat.pl homepage info - get ready to check NaTemat best content for Poland right away, or after learning these important things about natemat.pl

Najważniejsze i najciekawsze tematy dla milionów Polaków, którzy chcą trzymać rękę na pulsie. Wiadomości z kraju i ze świata, wywiady, opinie, reportaże.

Visit natemat.pl

Key Findings

We analyzed Natemat.pl page load time and found that the first response time was 658 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

natemat.pl performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.5 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,720 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.967

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.5 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

natemat.pl

658 ms

font-bizon-min.css

155 ms

2.1718091652771.d48510fc.chunk.css

108 ms

14.1718091652771.84fb2519.chunk.css

215 ms

appEntry.1718091652771.53618235.chunk.css

426 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Natemat.pl, 17% (8 requests) were made to Cmp.inmobi.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to S.natemat.pl. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (781 ms) relates to the external source Gapl.hit.gemius.pl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 441.9 kB (36%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

795.7 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Natemat.pl main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 751.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 401.8 kB

  • Original 452.5 kB
  • After minification 451.7 kB
  • After compression 50.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 401.8 kB or 89% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 39.7 kB

  • Original 751.4 kB
  • After minification 751.2 kB
  • After compression 711.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 376 B

  • Original 33.6 kB
  • After minification 33.6 kB
  • After compression 33.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Natemat.pl has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (76%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of NaTemat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

natemat.pl

natemat.pl

658 ms

font-bizon-min.css

font-bizon-min.css

155 ms

2.1718091652771.d48510fc.chunk.css

2.1718091652771.d48510fc.chunk.css

108 ms

14.1718091652771.84fb2519.chunk.css

14.1718091652771.84fb2519.chunk.css

215 ms

appEntry.1718091652771.53618235.chunk.css

appEntry.1718091652771.53618235.chunk.css

426 ms

278.1718091652771.bc0fca0a.chunk.css

278.1718091652771.bc0fca0a.chunk.css

321 ms

288.1718091652771.9b6bbe0e.chunk.css

288.1718091652771.9b6bbe0e.chunk.css

320 ms

Hyphenator.js

Hyphenator.js

438 ms

279.1718091652742.65407f8b.chunk.js

279.1718091652742.65407f8b.chunk.js

326 ms

2.1718091652742.e9898099.chunk.js

2.1718091652742.e9898099.chunk.js

326 ms

4.1718091652742.a62028a6.chunk.js

4.1718091652742.a62028a6.chunk.js

447 ms

sentry.1718091652742.8c9dd5b8.chunk.js

sentry.1718091652742.8c9dd5b8.chunk.js

537 ms

vendors.1718091652742.6208e1ef.chunk.js

vendors.1718091652742.6208e1ef.chunk.js

451 ms

appEntry.1718091652742.013ea833.chunk.js

appEntry.1718091652742.013ea833.chunk.js

774 ms

components__CategoryPage.1718091652742.da92d561.chunk.js

components__CategoryPage.1718091652742.da92d561.chunk.js

548 ms

main.1718091652742.627a6f81.chunk.js

main.1718091652742.627a6f81.chunk.js

549 ms

redesign__components__BCategoryt.1718091652742.f144db04.chunk.js

redesign__components__BCategoryt.1718091652742.f144db04.chunk.js

547 ms

278.1718091652742.4bc19158.chunk.js

278.1718091652742.4bc19158.chunk.js

763 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

449 ms

hmapxy.js

hmapxy.js

622 ms

286.1718091652742.a8342971.chunk.js

286.1718091652742.a8342971.chunk.js

175 ms

observer-polyfill.1718091652742.cd50c5c9.chunk.js

observer-polyfill.1718091652742.cd50c5c9.chunk.js

176 ms

277.1718091652742.7b898a62.chunk.js

277.1718091652742.7b898a62.chunk.js

227 ms

es6-polyfill.1718091652742.8d10ecaa.chunk.js

es6-polyfill.1718091652742.8d10ecaa.chunk.js

176 ms

fromEntries-polyfill.1718091652742.a854658d.chunk.js

fromEntries-polyfill.1718091652742.a854658d.chunk.js

174 ms

flatMap-polyfill.1718091652742.dac643d4.chunk.js

flatMap-polyfill.1718091652742.dac643d4.chunk.js

172 ms

sendBeacon-polyfill.1718091652742.d6ee728e.chunk.js

sendBeacon-polyfill.1718091652742.d6ee728e.chunk.js

225 ms

choice.js

choice.js

477 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

149 ms

xgemius.js

xgemius.js

781 ms

dc.js

dc.js

70 ms

prebid8.38.0.js

prebid8.38.0.js

52 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

33 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

60 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

152 ms

cmp2-polyfilled.js

cmp2-polyfilled.js

11 ms

geoip

geoip

12 ms

cmp-list.json

cmp-list.json

2 ms

cmp2ui-pl.js

cmp2ui-pl.js

7 ms

vendor-list-trimmed-v1.json

vendor-list-trimmed-v1.json

108 ms

google-atp-list.json

google-atp-list.json

186 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

481 ms

api.cmp.inmobi.com

api.cmp.inmobi.com

384 ms

purposes-pl.json

purposes-pl.json

14 ms

fpdata.js

fpdata.js

123 ms

lsget.html

lsget.html

557 ms

rexdot.js

rexdot.js

123 ms

Accessibility Review

natemat.pl accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

natemat.pl best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

natemat.pl SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    PL

  • Language Claimed

    PL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Natemat.pl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Natemat.pl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

natemat.pl

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of NaTemat. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: