3.1 sec in total
932 ms
1.7 sec
460 ms
Welcome to natureconservation.in homepage info - get ready to check Natureconservation best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about natureconservation.in
This domain may be for sale!
Visit natureconservation.inWe analyzed Natureconservation.in page load time and found that the first response time was 932 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
natureconservation.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
61/100
10%
Value3.0 s
78/100
25%
Value10.0 s
9/100
10%
Value1,960 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.354
31/100
15%
Value13.9 s
10/100
10%
932 ms
85 ms
72 ms
103 ms
237 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Natureconservation.in, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (932 ms) belongs to the original domain Natureconservation.in.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (53%)
3.1 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Natureconservation.in main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 348.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Natureconservation needs image optimization as it can save up to 348.1 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 659.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 659.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 575.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Natureconservation.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 575.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (61%)
44
17
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Natureconservation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
natureconservation.in
932 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
85 ms
um-recaptcha.css
72 ms
font-awesome.min.css
103 ms
bootstrap.css
237 ms
front.css
134 ms
style.css
291 ms
skin.css
106 ms
css
26 ms
um.min.css
303 ms
jetpack.css
202 ms
jquery.js
248 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
169 ms
bootstrap.min.js
248 ms
front.js
247 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
342 ms
api.js
63 ms
jquery.form.min.js
270 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
4 ms
tie-scripts.js
356 ms
ilightbox.packed.js
360 ms
masonry.min.js
358 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
358 ms
um.min.js
451 ms
wp-embed.min.js
359 ms
search.js
358 ms
e-201611.js
3 ms
css
61 ms
analytics.js
43 ms
body-bg7.png
96 ms
Logo-Abhinav-New.png
98 ms
home.png
97 ms
106-310x165.png
139 ms
053-310x165.png
138 ms
310-310x165.png
191 ms
301-3-310x165.png
191 ms
49-3-310x165.png
191 ms
314-3-310x165.png
192 ms
35-310x165.png
190 ms
287-2-310x165.png
191 ms
293-2-310x165.png
385 ms
13-3-310x165.png
383 ms
stripe.png
353 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
353 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
354 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
353 ms
BebasNeue-webfont.woff
354 ms
recaptcha__en.js
73 ms
collect
45 ms
natureconservation.in accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
natureconservation.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
natureconservation.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Natureconservation.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Natureconservation.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
natureconservation.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Natureconservation. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: