6.6 sec in total
2.2 sec
4.3 sec
90 ms
Click here to check amazing Nature Hub content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about naturehub.com
NatureHub is a conscious consumer marketplace and directory that helps you find healthy, sustainable, local products and businesses in the USA & Canada.
Visit naturehub.comWe analyzed Naturehub.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
naturehub.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.0 s
4/100
10%
Value16.4 s
0/100
25%
Value15.6 s
0/100
10%
Value670 ms
44/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value14.6 s
8/100
10%
2187 ms
410 ms
7 ms
99 ms
233 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Naturehub.com, 31% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 5% (2 requests) were made to Analytic.naturehub.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Naturehub.com.
Page size can be reduced by 380.6 kB (18%)
2.1 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Naturehub.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 339.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 339.0 kB or 54% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nature Hub images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 23.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (63%)
38
14
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nature Hub. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
naturehub.com
2187 ms
matomo.js
410 ms
email-decode.min.js
7 ms
js
99 ms
runtime.02f4895c5923414e.js
233 ms
polyfills.7abe6fec861cf92c.js
350 ms
scripts.c9a55c29a5efecfc.js
488 ms
main.eddd5c6676784387.js
734 ms
logoWithName.png
237 ms
logoWithoutName.png
238 ms
icon-location.svg
240 ms
decorator.png
784 ms
icon-search.svg
489 ms
add-business-icon.png
478 ms
decorator2.png
872 ms
decorator6.png
694 ms
appstore.png
497 ms
playstore.png
711 ms
device.png
1000 ms
fb.svg
938 ms
twitter.svg
940 ms
instagram.svg
741 ms
youtube.svg
751 ms
linkedin.svg
763 ms
1g166ss9j
203 ms
ProximaNova-Regular.d834acf9941875f0.woff
1092 ms
ProximaNova-Bold.d6ddbf7017f2df01.woff
1130 ms
ProximaNova-Extrabld.2fa542ba4becd399.woff
1193 ms
matomo.php
133 ms
styles.6c1ae7401eb8f355.css
487 ms
twk-arr-find-polyfill.js
58 ms
twk-object-values-polyfill.js
65 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
64 ms
twk-entries-polyfill.js
68 ms
twk-iterator-polyfill.js
59 ms
twk-promise-polyfill.js
174 ms
twk-main.js
115 ms
twk-vendor.js
167 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
214 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
238 ms
twk-runtime.js
125 ms
twk-app.js
175 ms
naturehub.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
[role]s do not have all required [aria-*] attributes
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
ARIA IDs are not unique
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
naturehub.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
naturehub.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Naturehub.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Naturehub.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
naturehub.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nature Hub. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: