Tools & Wizards About Us
natureinfocus.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

natureinfocus.com

Nature In Focus | Photos of Florida's Endangered Species, Plants, and Animals

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

56 ms

Resources Loaded

482 ms

Page Rendered

2.3 sec

natureinfocus.com screenshot

About Website

Visit natureinfocus.com now to see the best up-to-date Nature In Focus content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about natureinfocus.com

PhotoNaturalist Bill Boothe specializes in Florida endangered and threatened species. Nature and macro photography images, prints, and articles of Florida plants, animals and habitats.

Visit natureinfocus.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Natureinfocus.com page load time and found that the first response time was 56 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

natureinfocus.com performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,390 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.059

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

natureinfocus.com

56 ms

natureinfocus.com

62 ms

search-filter.min.css

12 ms

style.min.css

26 ms

theme.min.css

26 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Natureinfocus.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Static.cloudflareinsights.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (165 ms) belongs to the original domain Natureinfocus.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 183.7 kB (31%)

Content Size

593.5 kB

After Optimization

409.8 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Natureinfocus.com main page is 593.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 291.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 180.1 kB

  • Original 202.8 kB
  • After minification 202.5 kB
  • After compression 22.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 180.1 kB or 89% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 37 B

  • Original 291.6 kB
  • After minification 291.6 kB
  • After compression 291.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 99.0 kB
  • After minification 96.7 kB
  • After compression 95.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Natureinfocus.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (85%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nature In Focus. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 36 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

natureinfocus.com

natureinfocus.com

56 ms

natureinfocus.com

natureinfocus.com

62 ms

search-filter.min.css

search-filter.min.css

12 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

26 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

26 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

30 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

39 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

76 ms

widget-search.min.css

widget-search.min.css

24 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

41 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

32 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

36 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

42 ms

taxonomy-terms-list.min.css

taxonomy-terms-list.min.css

44 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

55 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

48 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

56 ms

autoptimize_single_f622e87fa5aaea0307ea11ca54c829f9.css

autoptimize_single_f622e87fa5aaea0307ea11ca54c829f9.css

53 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

63 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

78 ms

widget-flip-box.min.css

widget-flip-box.min.css

65 ms

widget-nested-carousel.min.css

widget-nested-carousel.min.css

67 ms

fadeInDown.min.css

fadeInDown.min.css

68 ms

widget-image-box.min.css

widget-image-box.min.css

73 ms

datatables.min.css

datatables.min.css

81 ms

views.min.css

views.min.css

84 ms

fadeInLeft.min.css

fadeInLeft.min.css

83 ms

fadeIn.min.css

fadeIn.min.css

98 ms

widget-posts.min.css

widget-posts.min.css

84 ms

widget-blockquote.min.css

widget-blockquote.min.css

89 ms

autoptimize_single_347fb1c64e5435ab35529675f4764ae4.css

autoptimize_single_347fb1c64e5435ab35529675f4764ae4.css

94 ms

autoptimize_single_257854c468e03805b66e7373ca3be625.css

autoptimize_single_257854c468e03805b66e7373ca3be625.css

98 ms

autoptimize_single_202c0b85fefe36ccda737fb17b8b5200.css

autoptimize_single_202c0b85fefe36ccda737fb17b8b5200.css

96 ms

autoptimize_single_7d3a75173c14afd89641372d3eedd00d.css

autoptimize_single_7d3a75173c14afd89641372d3eedd00d.css

103 ms

autoptimize_single_6efd0165e062cc836eeea90a061ff625.css

autoptimize_single_6efd0165e062cc836eeea90a061ff625.css

111 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

106 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

107 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

35 ms

dynamic-visibility.min.css

dynamic-visibility.min.css

105 ms

tooltip.min.css

tooltip.min.css

159 ms

autoptimize_single_6ab830f4fffa900efb813b69f77bd6d4.css

autoptimize_single_6ab830f4fffa900efb813b69f77bd6d4.css

148 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

163 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

165 ms

autoptimize_9ea424cdb100e16a96a13df5e6b29def.js

autoptimize_9ea424cdb100e16a96a13df5e6b29def.js

160 ms

nature-in-focus-logo.webp

nature-in-focus-logo.webp

99 ms

two-luna-moths-on-oak-tree-actias-luna-768x1152.webp

two-luna-moths-on-oak-tree-actias-luna-768x1152.webp

100 ms

burrowing-owl-portrait-768x1152.webp

burrowing-owl-portrait-768x1152.webp

100 ms

spoonleaf-sundew-glands-drosera-intermedia.webp

spoonleaf-sundew-glands-drosera-intermedia.webp

100 ms

rosegentian-sabatia.webp

rosegentian-sabatia.webp

101 ms

main.js

main.js

10 ms

nif-icons.woff

nif-icons.woff

88 ms

Accessibility Review

natureinfocus.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

natureinfocus.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

natureinfocus.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Natureinfocus.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Natureinfocus.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

natureinfocus.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nature In Focus. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: