Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

naturenet.net

Naturenet - Countryside Management & Nature Conservation

Page Load Speed

5.8 sec in total

First Response

261 ms

Resources Loaded

5.4 sec

Page Rendered

144 ms

naturenet.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to naturenet.net homepage info - get ready to check Naturenet best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about naturenet.net

The leading independent web resource for countryside management, nature conservation, and biodiversity in the UK and beyond.

Visit naturenet.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Naturenet.net page load time and found that the first response time was 261 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

naturenet.net performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

80/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

73/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

64/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value670 ms

44/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.053

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.5 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

naturenet.net

261 ms

naturenet.net

330 ms

index.php

162 ms

adsbygoogle.js

102 ms

natnet.css

160 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Naturenet.net, 13% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) relates to the external source Rss.bloople.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 30.8 kB (8%)

Content Size

366.0 kB

After Optimization

335.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Naturenet.net main page is 366.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 326.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 21.2 kB

  • Original 28.6 kB
  • After minification 24.9 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.6 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.2 kB or 74% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 500 B

  • Original 326.6 kB
  • After minification 326.6 kB
  • After compression 326.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 9.1 kB

  • Original 10.9 kB
  • After minification 10.0 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Naturenet.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (23%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Naturenet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

naturenet.net accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

naturenet.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

naturenet.net SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Naturenet.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Naturenet.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Naturenet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: