5.8 sec in total
261 ms
5.4 sec
144 ms
Welcome to naturenet.net homepage info - get ready to check Naturenet best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about naturenet.net
The leading independent web resource for countryside management, nature conservation, and biodiversity in the UK and beyond.
Visit naturenet.netWe analyzed Naturenet.net page load time and found that the first response time was 261 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
naturenet.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
80/100
10%
Value3.2 s
73/100
25%
Value5.0 s
64/100
10%
Value670 ms
44/100
30%
Value0.053
98/100
15%
Value8.5 s
38/100
10%
261 ms
330 ms
162 ms
102 ms
160 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Naturenet.net, 13% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) relates to the external source Rss.bloople.net.
Page size can be reduced by 30.8 kB (8%)
366.0 kB
335.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Naturenet.net main page is 366.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 326.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.6 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.2 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 500 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 9.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Naturenet.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (23%)
35
27
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Naturenet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
naturenet.net
261 ms
naturenet.net
330 ms
index.php
162 ms
adsbygoogle.js
102 ms
natnet.css
160 ms
adsbygoogle.js
96 ms
naturenetlogo.gif
157 ms
atr1.gif
167 ms
matt2.gif
240 ms
tinylakedistrictbw.gif
245 ms
spacer.gif
168 ms
tinybooksbw.gif
314 ms
tinywoodlandbw.gif
238 ms
tinydariusbw.gif
317 ms
tinynewforestbw.gif
260 ms
tinywalkersbw.gif
318 ms
gribble1.gif
319 ms
blogheader1.gif
326 ms
rss.bloople.net
4090 ms
js
69 ms
show_ads_impl.js
365 ms
pinkeyegraphics197.png
479 ms
zrt_lookup.html
22 ms
ads
339 ms
5c1rzbancy
89 ms
clarity.js
17 ms
tinylakedistrict.gif
161 ms
sodar
89 ms
tinybooks.gif
158 ms
tinywoodland.gif
158 ms
darius.gif
158 ms
newforest.gif
171 ms
tinywalkers.gif
81 ms
c.gif
7 ms
sodar2.js
16 ms
runner.html
4 ms
aframe
43 ms
OmRuia4kwTW85rnvP9OfgYBN7qcLsUaT01kRDQGYwvA.js
4 ms
naturenet.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
naturenet.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Page has valid source maps
naturenet.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Naturenet.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Naturenet.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
naturenet.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Naturenet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: