2.4 sec in total
70 ms
2.2 sec
122 ms
Visit natuurfoto.com now to see the best up-to-date Natuur Foto content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about natuurfoto.com
Workshops macrofotografie, galerijen en gerelateerde links.
Visit natuurfoto.comWe analyzed Natuurfoto.com page load time and found that the first response time was 70 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
natuurfoto.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value370 ms
70/100
30%
Value0.323
36/100
15%
Value8.5 s
38/100
10%
70 ms
71 ms
1944 ms
1345 ms
29 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Natuurfoto.com, 91% (40 requests) were made to Natuurfoto.nl and 2% (1 request) were made to P.jwpcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Natuurfoto.nl.
Page size can be reduced by 352.8 kB (31%)
1.1 MB
776.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Natuurfoto.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 668.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Natuur Foto images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 223.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 223.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 85.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Natuurfoto.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 85.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (88%)
42
5
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Natuur Foto. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
natuurfoto.com
70 ms
www.natuurfoto.nl
71 ms
www.natuurfoto.nl
1944 ms
dynamic-style.php
1345 ms
jquery.lightbox-0.5.css
29 ms
wpw_ba.css
28 ms
styles.css
27 ms
shortcodes.css
26 ms
ytprefs.min.css
38 ms
jquery.js
82 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
40 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
41 ms
wpw.drag.stuff.js
60 ms
wpw.ba.viewer.min.js
60 ms
jwplayer.js
261 ms
jquery.dotdotdot.min.js
61 ms
ytprefs.min.js
94 ms
panopress.js
85 ms
panopress.css
83 ms
title-excerpt-thumbnail.css
94 ms
hoverIntent.js
98 ms
superfish.js
101 ms
supersubs.js
127 ms
thematic-dropdowns.js
128 ms
jquery.jplayer.min.js
128 ms
jplayer.style.css
126 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
185 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
190 ms
comment-reply.min.js
180 ms
effect.min.js
189 ms
jquery.form.min.js
211 ms
scripts.js
198 ms
masonry.min.js
218 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
204 ms
fitvids.min.js
220 ms
wp-embed.min.js
227 ms
reset.css
31 ms
rebuild.css
30 ms
wp.css
29 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
82 ms
iframe_api
55 ms
Frans_logo.png
41 ms
Lieveheersbeestjes.jpg
116 ms
www-widgetapi.js
48 ms
natuurfoto.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
natuurfoto.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
natuurfoto.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
NL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Natuurfoto.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Dutch language. Our system also found out that Natuurfoto.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
natuurfoto.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Natuur Foto. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: