Tools & Wizards About Us
navapark.id screenshot

Report Summary

  • 10

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

navapark.id

Navapark

Page Load Speed

6.9 sec in total

First Response

549 ms

Resources Loaded

6.1 sec

Page Rendered

262 ms

navapark.id screenshot

About Website

Welcome to navapark.id homepage info - get ready to check Navapark best content right away, or after learning these important things about navapark.id

Navapark | Higher Living

Visit navapark.id

Key Findings

We analyzed Navapark.id page load time and found that the first response time was 549 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

navapark.id performance score

10

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,010 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.592

11/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.5 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

navapark.id

549 ms

523 ms

bootstrap.css

980 ms

font-awesome.min.css

904 ms

et-line-font.css

912 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Navapark.id, 3% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Navapark.id.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 451.0 kB (3%)

Content Size

15.5 MB

After Optimization

15.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Navapark.id main page is 15.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 14.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 24.7 kB

  • Original 27.8 kB
  • After minification 11.8 kB
  • After compression 3.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.0 kB, which is 57% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.7 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 39.9 kB

  • Original 14.8 MB
  • After minification 14.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Navapark images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 134.0 kB

  • Original 347.7 kB
  • After minification 337.1 kB
  • After compression 213.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 134.0 kB or 39% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 252.5 kB

  • Original 291.8 kB
  • After minification 232.6 kB
  • After compression 39.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Navapark.id needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 252.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (61%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Navapark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

navapark.id

navapark.id

549 ms

523 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

980 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

904 ms

et-line-font.css

et-line-font.css

912 ms

superslides.css

superslides.css

736 ms

vertical.css

vertical.css

767 ms

animate.css

animate.css

1318 ms

nav.css

nav.css

984 ms

style.css

style.css

1277 ms

video-style.css

video-style.css

1130 ms

popup.css

popup.css

1140 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

38 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

47 ms

jquery-2.1.3.min.js

jquery-2.1.3.min.js

987 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1235 ms

jquery.superslides.min.js

jquery.superslides.min.js

1158 ms

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.min.js

jquery.mb.YTPlayer.min.js

1160 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

1240 ms

jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js

jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js

1296 ms

js

js

85 ms

map.js

map.js

1347 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1386 ms

vanilla-form.js

vanilla-form.js

1390 ms

logo.png

logo.png

378 ms

1080x1080.jpg

1080x1080.jpg

629 ms

slide01.jpg

slide01.jpg

1720 ms

slide02.jpg

slide02.jpg

2874 ms

slide03.jpg

slide03.jpg

1860 ms

slide04.jpg

slide04.jpg

1882 ms

slide05.jpg

slide05.jpg

2085 ms

slide06.jpg

slide06.jpg

1126 ms

slide07.jpg

slide07.jpg

1379 ms

slide08.jpg

slide08.jpg

1875 ms

slide09.jpg

slide09.jpg

2233 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

111 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

59 ms

fontawesome-webfonte0a5.woff

fontawesome-webfonte0a5.woff

2033 ms

pattern_dot.png

pattern_dot.png

1797 ms

fontello.woff

fontello.woff

1783 ms

Accessibility Review

navapark.id accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

navapark.id best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

navapark.id SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Navapark.id can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Navapark.id main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

navapark.id

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Navapark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: