5.3 sec in total
222 ms
3.8 sec
1.3 sec
Visit navegate.com now to see the best up-to-date Navegate content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about navegate.com
Every day for the last 50 years, Navegate has worked to make supply chains move forward, faster. Providing best-in-class software and logistics services.
Visit navegate.comWe analyzed Navegate.com page load time and found that the first response time was 222 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
navegate.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.9 s
0/100
10%
Value54.7 s
0/100
25%
Value30.3 s
0/100
10%
Value29,070 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value54.6 s
0/100
10%
222 ms
179 ms
266 ms
260 ms
154 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Navegate.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fast.fonts.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Navegate.com.
Page size can be reduced by 286.8 kB (4%)
6.8 MB
6.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Navegate.com main page is 6.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 80.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 135.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Navegate images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 69.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 69.6 kB or 28% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Navegate.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (79%)
84
18
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Navegate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 37 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.navegate.com
222 ms
js
179 ms
ionicons.min.css
266 ms
css
260 ms
style.min.css
154 ms
styles.css
299 ms
cf7mls.css
297 ms
animate.min.css
299 ms
styles.css
307 ms
advwidgets_styles.css
302 ms
dashicons.min.css
305 ms
font-awesome.min.css
418 ms
icofont.min.css
408 ms
wpmm.css
502 ms
wp-megamenu.css
669 ms
wpmm-featuresbox.css
415 ms
wpmm-gridpost.css
421 ms
slick.css
525 ms
slick-slider-style.css
512 ms
rgs.css
520 ms
font-awesome.min.css
525 ms
style.css
886 ms
prettyPhoto.css
636 ms
responsive.css
642 ms
dynamic-combined.css
728 ms
ascend.css
918 ms
dynamic-mobmenu.css
747 ms
css
261 ms
css
260 ms
js_composer.min.css
731 ms
Defaults.css
1045 ms
ultimate.min.css
827 ms
mobmenu-icons.css
851 ms
mobmenu.css
848 ms
css
251 ms
css
251 ms
css
253 ms
jquery.min.js
940 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
925 ms
wpmm-featuresbox.js
928 ms
wpmm-gridpost.js
951 ms
navegate.min.js
985 ms
modernizr.js
1033 ms
core.min.js
1041 ms
a6a14cb6-8ef3-469d-b965-7c06a06165ee.js
244 ms
api.js
251 ms
5985306.js
298 ms
v652eace1692a40cfa3763df669d7439c1639079717194
260 ms
ultimate.min.js
1072 ms
mobmenu.js
957 ms
cf7mls.js
843 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
891 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1160 ms
index.js
1170 ms
wpmm.js
1180 ms
prettyPhoto.js
931 ms
superfish.js
817 ms
init.js
1050 ms
comment-reply.min.js
933 ms
index.js
924 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
945 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
945 ms
style.css
676 ms
screen.css
667 ms
mt.js
108 ms
Navegate-RLC-Logo-rev-V3.png
325 ms
Navegate-Logo-3x.png
159 ms
software.png
160 ms
services.png
162 ms
both-options.png
160 ms
Asset-2.png
163 ms
today_1.png
388 ms
accelerate_1.png
387 ms
analytics.js
102 ms
Log-In-Icon.png
963 ms
aerial-shot-building-business-2226458.jpg
1196 ms
collect
141 ms
fdc-colophon.png
198 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
200 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw3aX8.ttf
302 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
778 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
890 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
779 ms
ionicons.ttf
195 ms
recaptcha__en.js
838 ms
collect
966 ms
collectedforms.js
957 ms
5985306.js
956 ms
5985306.js
772 ms
fb.js
954 ms
ga-audiences
21 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
222 ms
navegate.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
navegate.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
navegate.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Navegate.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Navegate.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
navegate.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Navegate. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: