Report Summary

  • 80

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

navi.cx

Domain Recover - Backorder, Snapback, Drop-Catch Expired Domain Names

Page Load Speed

331 ms in total

First Response

84 ms

Resources Loaded

133 ms

Page Rendered

114 ms

navi.cx screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Navi content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about navi.cx

Domain Recover - Backorder, Snapback, Drop-Catch Expired Domain Names

Visit navi.cx

Key Findings

We analyzed Navi.cx page load time and found that the first response time was 84 ms and then it took 247 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

navi.cx performance score

80

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

52/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.014

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.2 s

86/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

navi.cx

84 ms

navi.css

13 ms

navi_small.png

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Navi.cx and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (84 ms) belongs to the original domain Navi.cx.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 13.4 kB (31%)

Content Size

43.5 kB

After Optimization

30.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Navi.cx main page is 43.5 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 42.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 396 B

  • Original 821 B
  • After minification 722 B
  • After compression 425 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 99 B, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 396 B or 48% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 12.7 kB

  • Original 42.1 kB
  • After minification 29.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Navi needs image optimization as it can save up to 12.7 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 355 B

  • Original 581 B
  • After minification 435 B
  • After compression 226 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Navi.cx needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 355 B or 61% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Navi. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

navi.cx accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

navi.cx best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

navi.cx SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Navi.cx can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Navi.cx main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Navi. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: