Tools & Wizards About Us
nazemidc.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

nazemidc.com

Best Chiropractor Palm Desert | Back Pain Doctors Palm Springs |

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

60 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

373 ms

nazemidc.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Nazemidc content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about nazemidc.com

At Nazemi Chiropractic we focus on providing safe and effective care to people of all ages and backgrounds with an emphasis in sports rehabilitation.

Visit nazemidc.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nazemidc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 60 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nazemidc.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

41/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,090 ms

24/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.9 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nazemidc.com

60 ms

www.nazemidc.com

554 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

33 ms

bootstrap.min.css

95 ms

css

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Nazemidc.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (880 ms) relates to the external source Nazemidc.creativetakeweb.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 79.1 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Nazemidc.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 45.5 kB

  • Original 55.7 kB
  • After minification 50.6 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 20.2 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nazemidc images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 9.5 kB

  • Original 282.7 kB
  • After minification 282.3 kB
  • After compression 273.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 3.9 kB

  • Original 29.2 kB
  • After minification 29.2 kB
  • After compression 25.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nazemidc.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.9 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (62%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nazemidc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

nazemidc.com

nazemidc.com

60 ms

www.nazemidc.com

www.nazemidc.com

554 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

33 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

95 ms

css

css

46 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

44 ms

slicknav.min.css

slicknav.min.css

70 ms

style.css

style.css

106 ms

bx-slider.css

bx-slider.css

83 ms

resp.css

resp.css

103 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

85 ms

styles.css

styles.css

100 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

129 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

114 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

41 ms

fastclick.js

fastclick.js

118 ms

jquery.fittext.js

jquery.fittext.js

117 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

116 ms

supersubs.js

supersubs.js

169 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

170 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

172 ms

sticky.min.js

sticky.min.js

175 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

173 ms

html5.js

html5.js

174 ms

TweenMax.min.js

TweenMax.min.js

49 ms

ScrollMagic.min.js

ScrollMagic.min.js

113 ms

animation.gsap.js

animation.gsap.js

62 ms

main.js

main.js

195 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

200 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

198 ms

index.js

index.js

199 ms

api.js

api.js

57 ms

index.js

index.js

198 ms

Screen-Shot-2016-11-03-at-7.10.01-PM.png

Screen-Shot-2016-11-03-at-7.10.01-PM.png

880 ms

app.js

app.js

181 ms

Nlogoblack_C10241024_1.png

Nlogoblack_C10241024_1.png

94 ms

slider1.jpg

slider1.jpg

178 ms

slider2.jpg

slider2.jpg

238 ms

slider3.jpg

slider3.jpg

239 ms

bg-welcome.jpg

bg-welcome.jpg

265 ms

7922.png

7922.png

173 ms

Emsculpt-neo_LOGO_Rounded-neo-R_Two-blue.png

Emsculpt-neo_LOGO_Rounded-neo-R_Two-blue.png

174 ms

doc1.png

doc1.png

237 ms

doc2.png

doc2.png

237 ms

bg-review.jpg

bg-review.jpg

237 ms

quote.png

quote.png

277 ms

cert-1.png

cert-1.png

276 ms

cert-2.png

cert-2.png

277 ms

contact-bg.jpg

contact-bg.jpg

277 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

128 ms

bx_loader.gif

bx_loader.gif

107 ms

font

font

69 ms

hinted-NeutraText-Book.woff

hinted-NeutraText-Book.woff

108 ms

font

font

83 ms

icomoon.ttf

icomoon.ttf

130 ms

Accessibility Review

nazemidc.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role] values are not valid

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

nazemidc.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

nazemidc.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nazemidc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nazemidc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

nazemidc.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nazemidc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: