Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

nea.lt

Chat

Page Load Speed

10.8 sec in total

First Response

690 ms

Resources Loaded

9.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

nea.lt screenshot

About Website

Visit nea.lt now to see the best up-to-date Nea content for Lithuania and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nea.lt

NEA.LT - pažintys, diskusijos, juokingi gifai, anekdotai, straipsniai, paveikslėliai, demotyvacijos, asmenybė pagal gimimo skaičių ir dar daugiau pramogų!

Visit nea.lt

Key Findings

We analyzed Nea.lt page load time and found that the first response time was 690 ms and then it took 10.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nea.lt performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

50/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.327

35/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.2 s

63/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nea.lt

690 ms

css

71 ms

css

83 ms

css

49 ms

main.css

335 ms

Our browser made a total of 201 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (172 requests) were addressed to the original Nea.lt, 3% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Nea.lt.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 440.9 kB (31%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

993.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Nea.lt main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 838.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 133.1 kB

  • Original 162.7 kB
  • After minification 152.1 kB
  • After compression 29.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 133.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 838.8 kB
  • After minification 838.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nea images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 168.0 kB

  • Original 256.8 kB
  • After minification 256.3 kB
  • After compression 88.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 168.0 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 139.8 kB

  • Original 175.8 kB
  • After minification 174.1 kB
  • After compression 36.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nea.lt needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 139.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (30%)

Requests Now

194

After Optimization

135

The browser has sent 194 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nea. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

nea.lt accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

nea.lt best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

nea.lt SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    LT

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nea.lt can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Lithuanian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Nea.lt main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nea. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: