4.3 sec in total
386 ms
3.4 sec
546 ms
Visit nedstone.com now to see the best up-to-date Nedstone content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nedstone.com
Visit nedstone.comWe analyzed Nedstone.com page load time and found that the first response time was 386 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
nedstone.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.5 s
0/100
10%
Value12.2 s
0/100
25%
Value11.5 s
5/100
10%
Value300 ms
78/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value21.5 s
1/100
10%
386 ms
168 ms
174 ms
171 ms
24 ms
Our browser made a total of 128 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Nedstone.com, 41% (52 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Nedstone.com.
Page size can be reduced by 954.3 kB (9%)
11.1 MB
10.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Nedstone.com main page is 11.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 10.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 79.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.3 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.4 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 409.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nedstone images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 443.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 443.4 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nedstone.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (31%)
127
88
The browser has sent 127 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nedstone. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
nedstone.com
386 ms
base.min.css
168 ms
skeleton.min.css
174 ms
layout.css
171 ms
css
24 ms
ie-gte10-compatibility.css
175 ms
demis_bril.jpg
1181 ms
dylan_van_heusden.jpg
1172 ms
petra_baltus.jpg
951 ms
jeffrey_plas.jpg
1098 ms
kai_jansen.jpg
1495 ms
koen_de_wit.jpg
1276 ms
marcel_de_groot.jpg
1397 ms
alexandra_van_slooten.jpg
1185 ms
tom_snoek.jpg
1539 ms
wouter_beeldman.jpg
1625 ms
logo.png
1278 ms
flexas.png
1394 ms
flexas_mobile.png
1364 ms
2010-april.jpg
1455 ms
2010-june.jpg
1478 ms
2011-march.jpg
1479 ms
2011-april.jpg
1540 ms
jquery.min.js
37 ms
modernizr-latest.js
1496 ms
TweenMax.min.js
1496 ms
jquery.superscrollorama.js
1543 ms
jquery.spriteOnHover-0.2.5.min.js
1545 ms
jquery.backstretch.min.js
44 ms
scrolld.js
1544 ms
waypoints.min.js
1579 ms
js
52 ms
site.js
1597 ms
slider.min.js
1598 ms
2011-october.jpg
1717 ms
2011-december.jpg
1716 ms
2012-february.jpg
1714 ms
2012-august.jpg
1714 ms
2013-april.jpg
1713 ms
2014-january-1.jpg
1714 ms
2014-march.jpg
1853 ms
2014-may.jpg
1779 ms
regus.png
1776 ms
travelbird.png
1774 ms
iberia.png
1748 ms
ing.png
988 ms
too.png
919 ms
gasunie.png
852 ms
cbc.png
842 ms
merin.png
833 ms
status.gif
745 ms
brands-down.png
742 ms
staff-down.png
743 ms
history-down.png
712 ms
white-transparent.png
711 ms
black-transparent.png
651 ms
prev.png
628 ms
next.png
629 ms
orange-transparent.png
678 ms
sprite.png
640 ms
analytics.js
122 ms
nedstone-kantoor-1.jpg
651 ms
nedstone-kantoor-2.jpg
575 ms
nedstone-kantoor-3.jpg
569 ms
nedstone-kantoor-4.jpg
482 ms
nedstone-kantoor-5.jpg
565 ms
nedstone-kantoor-6.jpg
568 ms
home.jpg
827 ms
brands.jpg
656 ms
common.js
30 ms
map.js
49 ms
util.js
82 ms
marker.js
80 ms
collect
56 ms
onion.js
21 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
77 ms
stats.js
59 ms
controls.js
55 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
159 ms
transparent.png
21 ms
css
61 ms
google4.png
24 ms
marker-google.png
426 ms
mapcnt6.png
17 ms
sv5.png
21 ms
vt
74 ms
vt
54 ms
vt
67 ms
vt
80 ms
vt
68 ms
vt
70 ms
vt
126 ms
vt
102 ms
vt
108 ms
vt
137 ms
vt
118 ms
vt
137 ms
vt
158 ms
vt
174 ms
vt
172 ms
vt
188 ms
vt
203 ms
vt
198 ms
vt
236 ms
vt
204 ms
vt
234 ms
vt
233 ms
vt
246 ms
vt
265 ms
vt
237 ms
vt
267 ms
vt
269 ms
vt
297 ms
vt
263 ms
vt
290 ms
vt
326 ms
vt
291 ms
vt
318 ms
vt
332 ms
vt
319 ms
vt
318 ms
vt
355 ms
vt
312 ms
vt
293 ms
vt
314 ms
vt
289 ms
vt
300 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
123 ms
nedstone.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
nedstone.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
nedstone.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
NL
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nedstone.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Nedstone.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nedstone.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nedstone. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: