Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

neo-tools.com

NEO Tools - narzędzia dla profesjonalistów - GTX

Page Load Speed

7.5 sec in total

First Response

2 sec

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

812 ms

neo-tools.com screenshot

About Website

Visit neo-tools.com now to see the best up-to-date NEO Tools content for Poland and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about neo-tools.com

Marka NEO Tools to niezawodne narzędzia o wysokiej wytrzymałości, precyzji wykonania i jakości. Polecane dla profesjonalistów.

Visit neo-tools.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Neo-tools.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

neo-tools.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,000 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.247

50/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.9 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

1978 ms

styles.css

527 ms

allow-webp-image-public.css

321 ms

rs6.css

444 ms

wpr-hamburger.css

447 ms

Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Neo-tools.com, 17% (12 requests) were made to Hubgt.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source Gtx-group.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 468.1 kB (18%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Neo-tools.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 80.8 kB

  • Original 98.4 kB
  • After minification 87.2 kB
  • After compression 17.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.3 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 32.4 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. NEO Tools images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 348.3 kB

  • Original 896.3 kB
  • After minification 895.8 kB
  • After compression 548.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 348.3 kB or 39% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 6.6 kB

  • Original 57.9 kB
  • After minification 57.8 kB
  • After compression 51.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Neo-tools.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.6 kB or 11% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (59%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

23

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of NEO Tools. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

neo-tools.com accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

neo-tools.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

neo-tools.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    PL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Neo-tools.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Polish. Our system also found out that Neo-tools.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of NEO Tools. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: