Report Summary

  • 82

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

neofly.com

NEOFLY Agency | Développement Web & Mobile

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

317 ms

Resources Loaded

765 ms

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

neofly.com screenshot

About Website

Visit neofly.com now to see the best up-to-date NEOFLY content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about neofly.com

Agence de développement PHP/Symfony d'applications Web et Mobile

Visit neofly.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Neofly.com page load time and found that the first response time was 317 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

neofly.com performance score

82

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.0 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

76/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

neofly.com

317 ms

neofly-inprogress.css

114 ms

ga.js

15 ms

fond_degrade.png

146 ms

header_fond.png

334 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Neofly.com, 20% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (334 ms) belongs to the original domain Neofly.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 9.9 kB (4%)

Content Size

231.1 kB

After Optimization

221.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Neofly.com main page is 231.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 210.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 3.0 kB
  • After minification 2.7 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.7 kB or 56% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 8.1 kB

  • Original 210.2 kB
  • After minification 202.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. NEOFLY images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 60 B

  • Original 640 B
  • After minification 640 B
  • After compression 580 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Neofly.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of NEOFLY. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

neofly.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

neofly.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

neofly.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Neofly.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Neofly.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of NEOFLY. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: