Tools & Wizards About Us
neologic.dev screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

neologic.dev

Modernizing & Digitizing Business Processes | Neologic

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

781 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

913 ms

neologic.dev screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Neologic content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about neologic.dev

Considering custom software? Learn why companies turn to custom software development to modernize and digitize their business processes.

Visit neologic.dev

Key Findings

We analyzed Neologic.dev page load time and found that the first response time was 781 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

neologic.dev performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

44/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

68/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,100 ms

24/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

neologic.dev

781 ms

js

62 ms

87 ms

css2

29 ms

widget.html

129 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Neologic.dev, 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Neologic.dev.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 688.1 kB (80%)

Content Size

857.3 kB

After Optimization

169.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Neologic.dev main page is 857.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 811.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 680.0 kB

  • Original 811.7 kB
  • After minification 811.2 kB
  • After compression 131.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 680.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 8.1 kB

  • Original 44.2 kB
  • After minification 36.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Neologic needs image optimization as it can save up to 8.1 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 72 B

  • Original 1.4 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (77%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Neologic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

neologic.dev

neologic.dev

781 ms

js

js

62 ms

87 ms

css2

css2

29 ms

widget.html

widget.html

129 ms

polyfills-0d99f35c0d725c64c5d5.js

polyfills-0d99f35c0d725c64c5d5.js

323 ms

index.js

index.js

342 ms

_app.js

_app.js

411 ms

webpack-9369c5c69dbf6d4912cb.js

webpack-9369c5c69dbf6d4912cb.js

315 ms

framework.1aca562006664c5eb2f5.js

framework.1aca562006664c5eb2f5.js

393 ms

69d46edc.e9dd28b73f9eaf50de84.js

69d46edc.e9dd28b73f9eaf50de84.js

413 ms

9537eaa4f315e44e6fd6f72db27703f3887ce9ff.d5f1cc1266da51c9b8b5.js

9537eaa4f315e44e6fd6f72db27703f3887ce9ff.d5f1cc1266da51c9b8b5.js

653 ms

619de3ea6ac3949e5adae3f070af250b1fc0a405.8f98f135cd6ddbbd026a.js

619de3ea6ac3949e5adae3f070af250b1fc0a405.8f98f135cd6ddbbd026a.js

633 ms

c7def02d803f8ac967091fcfdd9406b762e19dd4.2e0661cdaf663fd731ff.js

c7def02d803f8ac967091fcfdd9406b762e19dd4.2e0661cdaf663fd731ff.js

702 ms

1e81a6f0860bd29e5b8ee342d6e89d6b6b458458.d8107f79a8686632d70b.js

1e81a6f0860bd29e5b8ee342d6e89d6b6b458458.d8107f79a8686632d70b.js

705 ms

88a3424f49d03981bcbe8193985556e55f1cb15e.87b27959d13a7f238862.js

88a3424f49d03981bcbe8193985556e55f1cb15e.87b27959d13a7f238862.js

824 ms

77325ddfdc56fb809d5959e2069795b69e49f851.7a32e56760701ab92620.js

77325ddfdc56fb809d5959e2069795b69e49f851.7a32e56760701ab92620.js

735 ms

493cacb70a55bd6ecb67f7a02b5beb817c9d2182.b9f4674ac484424f4200.js

493cacb70a55bd6ecb67f7a02b5beb817c9d2182.b9f4674ac484424f4200.js

912 ms

styles.dbf5aa6e4392d5091568.js

styles.dbf5aa6e4392d5091568.js

961 ms

main-e064c6a5aba1196670f2.js

main-e064c6a5aba1196670f2.js

999 ms

0cc9a0b532d33ba3a80fccf6d063f9951287aa99.491f585e623c95d4a9c7.js

0cc9a0b532d33ba3a80fccf6d063f9951287aa99.491f585e623c95d4a9c7.js

1016 ms

50f5e9fb3ee2017688b365ddb30d383fe56263ae.284e67b8b16460ec5e77.js

50f5e9fb3ee2017688b365ddb30d383fe56263ae.284e67b8b16460ec5e77.js

1063 ms

1b04f673510cf2d4e1e6c35f5123388dd1e00c3f.41701237d0a548f1ed8b.js

1b04f673510cf2d4e1e6c35f5123388dd1e00c3f.41701237d0a548f1ed8b.js

1136 ms

cf424cd46cf5091b7befa0fe1938bc19b3082749.1bbc601364227c815e9e.js

cf424cd46cf5091b7befa0fe1938bc19b3082749.1bbc601364227c815e9e.js

1199 ms

a2457cd2776d34cb7db2a0f7320a1437d9b9e840.df2b2a384f9fd25e2f85.js

a2457cd2776d34cb7db2a0f7320a1437d9b9e840.df2b2a384f9fd25e2f85.js

1353 ms

a015503914990264468b9c7d2522a2362f097de5.42470e7ddd5cd9e37b01.js

a015503914990264468b9c7d2522a2362f097de5.42470e7ddd5cd9e37b01.js

1385 ms

7b830fc2dd09ad7a8b73d9366be3292201e6254c.a38a1e20c57b51fae441.js

7b830fc2dd09ad7a8b73d9366be3292201e6254c.a38a1e20c57b51fae441.js

1342 ms

f8d4a5e6b685aed08b4213f2f274a4b0c69dd915.035b601bf0783fd193b5.js

f8d4a5e6b685aed08b4213f2f274a4b0c69dd915.035b601bf0783fd193b5.js

1450 ms

7d038501383ba7aaccdd93a6a9138c7df040b619.fe75c0209719f3cb8db7.js

7d038501383ba7aaccdd93a6a9138c7df040b619.fe75c0209719f3cb8db7.js

1431 ms

f7e53f2575d547a01202073eed608c7e80dc22c5_CSS.1e19698fb2ce3d993458.js

f7e53f2575d547a01202073eed608c7e80dc22c5_CSS.1e19698fb2ce3d993458.js

1476 ms

53eafe50929692b3c2410c7df9e67a520eee0017.3580d9b7bb1917ee28dc.js

53eafe50929692b3c2410c7df9e67a520eee0017.3580d9b7bb1917ee28dc.js

1719 ms

8f27cb28fc473e05c7b424fe30c40a46fc114006.ca9d3fbaf0b32f2b0af0.js

8f27cb28fc473e05c7b424fe30c40a46fc114006.ca9d3fbaf0b32f2b0af0.js

1661 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

1654 ms

clutchIcon.png

clutchIcon.png

1812 ms

expertiseIcon.png

expertiseIcon.png

1832 ms

46 ms

union-white.svg

union-white.svg

1730 ms

arrow-gradient.svg

arrow-gradient.svg

1902 ms

union.svg

union.svg

1920 ms

9oRONYoBnWILk-9ArCg.ttf

9oRONYoBnWILk-9ArCg.ttf

255 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

16 ms

widget.js

widget.js

44 ms

Accessibility Review

neologic.dev accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

neologic.dev best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

neologic.dev SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Neologic.dev can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Neologic.dev main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

neologic.dev

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Neologic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: