Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

neomarin.ru

"Неомарин", морская и пресноводная аквариумистика.

Page Load Speed

22.2 sec in total

First Response

150 ms

Resources Loaded

21.8 sec

Page Rendered

232 ms

neomarin.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to neomarin.ru homepage info - get ready to check Neomarin best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about neomarin.ru

аквариум, морская аквариумистика, морской аквариум, рифовый аквариум, пресноводный аквариум, Dr. Biener GmbH (Tropic Marin), Fauna Marin, Preis Aquaristik, EcoTech Marin, Aquaroche, Pacific-sun, Aquad...

Visit neomarin.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Neomarin.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 150 ms and then it took 22 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

neomarin.ru performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

60/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,650 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.019

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mainpage

150 ms

screen.css

130 ms

stylesheet.css

248 ms

stylesheet_boxes.css

250 ms

stylesheet_css_buttons.css

256 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Neomarin.ru, 12% (8 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Trustorg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.1 sec) relates to the external source Hit41.hotlog.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 56.8 kB (4%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Neomarin.ru main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 981.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 17.6 kB

  • Original 23.5 kB
  • After minification 18.8 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.7 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.6 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 981.3 kB
  • After minification 976.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Neomarin images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

  • Original 250.6 kB
  • After minification 250.6 kB
  • After compression 218.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 70.2 kB
  • After minification 70.1 kB
  • After compression 67.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Neomarin.ru has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (37%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Neomarin. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

neomarin.ru accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

neomarin.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

neomarin.ru SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Neomarin.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Neomarin.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Neomarin. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: