Tools & Wizards About Us
nepxpress.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 55

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

nepxpress.com

NepXpress :: Navigating Success Together.

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

274 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

381 ms

nepxpress.com screenshot

About Website

Visit nepxpress.com now to see the best up-to-date Nep Xpress content for Nepal and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nepxpress.com

Visit nepxpress.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nepxpress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 274 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nepxpress.com performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

37/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.4 s

84/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nepxpress.com

274 ms

bootstrap.min.css

111 ms

font-awesome.min.css

203 ms

animate.min.css

158 ms

et-line-font.css

166 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Nepxpress.com, 10% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (542 ms) belongs to the original domain Nepxpress.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 90.2 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Nepxpress.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 26.5 kB

  • Original 32.7 kB
  • After minification 22.8 kB
  • After compression 6.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.9 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 54.6 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nep Xpress images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.5 kB

  • Original 195.8 kB
  • After minification 195.8 kB
  • After compression 190.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 38.4 kB
  • After minification 38.4 kB
  • After compression 34.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nepxpress.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (64%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nep Xpress. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

nepxpress.com

nepxpress.com

274 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

111 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

203 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

158 ms

et-line-font.css

et-line-font.css

166 ms

nivo-lightbox.css

nivo-lightbox.css

147 ms

default.css

default.css

141 ms

style.css

style.css

205 ms

css

css

33 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

209 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

215 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

290 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

232 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

389 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

331 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

288 ms

isotope.js

isotope.js

330 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

335 ms

nivo-lightbox.min.js

nivo-lightbox.min.js

368 ms

jquery.backstretch.min.js

jquery.backstretch.min.js

405 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

404 ms

custom.js

custom.js

404 ms

about-img.jpg

about-img.jpg

360 ms

portfolio-img1.jpg

portfolio-img1.jpg

403 ms

portfolio-img2.jpg

portfolio-img2.jpg

344 ms

portfolio-img3.jpg

portfolio-img3.jpg

407 ms

portfolio-img4.jpg

portfolio-img4.jpg

371 ms

portfolio-img5.jpg

portfolio-img5.jpg

441 ms

portfolio-img6.jpg

portfolio-img6.jpg

542 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

20 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

24 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

37 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

354 ms

embed

embed

221 ms

contact-bg.jpg

contact-bg.jpg

460 ms

home-bg-slideshow1.jpg

home-bg-slideshow1.jpg

360 ms

home-bg-slideshow2.jpg

home-bg-slideshow2.jpg

401 ms

js

js

38 ms

search.js

search.js

4 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

8 ms

main.js

main.js

14 ms

Accessibility Review

nepxpress.com accessibility score

55

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

nepxpress.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

nepxpress.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nepxpress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Nepxpress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

nepxpress.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nep Xpress. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: