4.9 sec in total
526 ms
4.1 sec
249 ms
Click here to check amazing Nesaap content for Latvia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about nesaap.lv
Sāpes sejā, sāpes un sausums acīs, saaukstēšanās, galvassāpes, laringīts, faringīts. Kādi ir iemesli, kā var izpausties un kādi ir ieteikumi rīcībai?
Visit nesaap.lvWe analyzed Nesaap.lv page load time and found that the first response time was 526 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
nesaap.lv performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value9.3 s
1/100
25%
Value10.3 s
8/100
10%
Value230 ms
87/100
30%
Value0.541
14/100
15%
Value11.9 s
16/100
10%
526 ms
122 ms
248 ms
247 ms
247 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Nesaap.lv, 14% (14 requests) were made to Ifrype.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Nesaap.lv.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (68%)
1.7 MB
547.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Nesaap.lv main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 739.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 70.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.7 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 37.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Nesaap needs image optimization as it can save up to 37.5 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 485.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 485.0 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 551.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nesaap.lv needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 551.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (54%)
93
43
The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nesaap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
nesaap.lv
526 ms
style.css
122 ms
styles.css
248 ms
polls-css.css
247 ms
featured-post.css
247 ms
style.css
248 ms
ss_style.css
247 ms
jquery.js
365 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
362 ms
ajax.js
362 ms
topsy.js
186 ms
wp-activity.css
357 ms
jquery.watermarkinput.js
358 ms
less-1.3.0.min.js
477 ms
custom.js
474 ms
lv8f121ce07d74717e0b1f21d122e04521.js
272 ms
brand
139 ms
newaccordian.js
473 ms
wpBannerizeStyleDefault.css
473 ms
jquery.form.min.js
474 ms
scripts.js
478 ms
polls-js.js
589 ms
wp-embed.min.js
589 ms
wpBannerizeFrontend.min.js
590 ms
reset.css
479 ms
custom.css
479 ms
brand
112 ms
HT201285
32 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
343 ms
header-top.png
249 ms
logo.png
248 ms
teva_728x90_lv.gif
733 ms
nav-bg.png
248 ms
nav-divider.png
248 ms
Olfen.png
248 ms
vingrojumi.jpg
403 ms
loading.gif
403 ms
facebook-logo.png
402 ms
twitter-logo.png
403 ms
youtube-logo.png
401 ms
rss-logo.png
510 ms
teva_olfen.jpg
510 ms
kakla_sapes1.jpg
506 ms
vingrojumi_kaklam.jpg
507 ms
biroja_dzive.gif
1081 ms
woman_front.png
728 ms
woman_back.png
616 ms
man_front.png
611 ms
man_back.png
612 ms
miti_bilde_7.jpg
966 ms
footer-image.png
731 ms
opentag-66234-1173829.js
242 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
232 ms
EoV1Vgr_EvM
280 ms
list-bullet.png
698 ms
social-links-bg.png
812 ms
pp_switch_bg.png
812 ms
arrow-up-down.png
814 ms
analytics.js
191 ms
ajax-loader.gif
612 ms
conversion.js
33 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
6 ms
41 ms
tag2
214 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
34 ms
www-embed-player.js
59 ms
base.js
94 ms
72 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
18 ms
ad_status.js
56 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
57 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
58 ms
484 ms
new.rel.css
850 ms
fans.css
619 ms
xGlobal.js
635 ms
base.js
879 ms
common.rel.js
899 ms
t.rel.js
899 ms
struct.js
731 ms
say.rel.js
973 ms
946dd963c3.js
878 ms
print.css
119 ms
i_13353125.jpg
643 ms
i_4962703.jpg
667 ms
i_5246661.jpg
626 ms
i_637804.jpg
654 ms
i_3930542.jpg
594 ms
i_1109061.jpg
667 ms
i_502552.jpg
602 ms
i_1254404.jpg
654 ms
top_bg.png
116 ms
logo.png
114 ms
footer_bg.png
114 ms
i_175925.jpg
643 ms
i_1223195.jpg
656 ms
button.png
115 ms
followLogo.png
114 ms
nesaap.lv accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
nesaap.lv best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
nesaap.lv SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
LV
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nesaap.lv can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Latvian/Lettish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Nesaap.lv main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nesaap.lv
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nesaap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: