26.8 sec in total
436 ms
23.9 sec
2.5 sec
Click here to check amazing Netflex content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about netflex.no
Visit netflex.noWe analyzed Netflex.no page load time and found that the first response time was 436 ms and then it took 26.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 3 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
netflex.no performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value6.7 s
8/100
25%
Value5.4 s
56/100
10%
Value110 ms
98/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.5 s
70/100
10%
436 ms
1118 ms
232 ms
2123 ms
405 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Netflex.no, 86% (44 requests) were made to D3ark3w4oflfom.cloudfront.net and 4% (2 requests) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.5 sec) relates to the external source D3ark3w4oflfom.cloudfront.net.
Page size can be reduced by 426.3 kB (5%)
8.4 MB
8.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Netflex.no main page is 8.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 7.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.8 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 75.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Netflex images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 136.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 136.3 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 198.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Netflex.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 198.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (50%)
44
22
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Netflex. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
netflex.no
436 ms
netflex.no
1118 ms
font-awesome.min.css
232 ms
1406278481.css
2123 ms
1399021099.css
405 ms
1399019758.css
621 ms
1399019742.css
784 ms
1406285718.css
492 ms
1406285637.css
477 ms
1406285866.css
782 ms
1399034898.css
877 ms
jquery-latest.min.js
870 ms
1399019780.js
792 ms
1399019795.js
759 ms
1399019801.js
1080 ms
1399019820.js
1116 ms
1399019826.js
1178 ms
1399019832.js
1211 ms
1399019746.js
1212 ms
1399019810.js
1735 ms
1399019814.js
1586 ms
1399019767.js
1609 ms
1399019754.js
1567 ms
1399019837.js
2237 ms
1399033059.js
1713 ms
analytics.js
253 ms
menu-icon@2x.png
381 ms
netflex_logo.png
1005 ms
awhcbhlqrcecdjcpqunn_img_0249.jpg
6230 ms
asplan.png
7051 ms
asplanviak2.png
4521 ms
prosjektbilder_0003_asplanprosjekter.png
7492 ms
prosjekter_0004_layer-comp-5.png
11297 ms
prosjekter_0018_layer-comp-19.png
10710 ms
prosjekter_0024_layer-comp-25.png
16231 ms
prosjekter_0002_layer-comp-3.png
20203 ms
prosjekter_0012_layer-comp-13.png
12975 ms
aktiv365forside.png
16224 ms
prosjekter_0007_layer-comp-8.png
14955 ms
prosjekter_0013_layer-comp-14.png
13277 ms
prosjekter_0025_layer-comp-26.png
19080 ms
prosjekter_0011_layer-comp-12.png
16873 ms
prosjekter_0020_layer-comp-21.png
19075 ms
aasanetidene.png
19699 ms
prosjekter_0010_layer-comp-11.png
17741 ms
prosjekter_0021_layer-comp-22.png
19090 ms
prosjekter_0026_layer-comp-27.png
20457 ms
prosjekter_0001_layer-comp-2.png
20458 ms
prosjekter_0022_layer-comp-23.png
20457 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
146 ms
collect
90 ms
netflex.no accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
netflex.no best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
netflex.no SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Netflex.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Netflex.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
netflex.no
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Netflex. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: