Tools & Wizards About Us
netlibsecurity.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

netlibsecurity.com

Secure Data Encryption | NetLib Security | Encryptionizer

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

263 ms

Resources Loaded

831 ms

Page Rendered

230 ms

netlibsecurity.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Net Lib Security content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about netlibsecurity.com

NetLib Security’s powerful, patented data encryption security platform, Encryptionizer, helps companies manage their encryption needs with a simple, scalable and cost effective solution. 

Visit netlibsecurity.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Netlibsecurity.com page load time and found that the first response time was 263 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

netlibsecurity.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

59/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value910 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.045

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.4 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

netlibsecurity.com

263 ms

gtm.js

82 ms

js

145 ms

style.min.css

43 ms

front.min.css

65 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Netlibsecurity.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (305 ms) belongs to the original domain Netlibsecurity.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 586.4 kB (28%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Netlibsecurity.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 66.2 kB

  • Original 87.1 kB
  • After minification 82.0 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.2 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 453.0 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 992.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Net Lib Security needs image optimization as it can save up to 453.0 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 64.0 kB

  • Original 471.9 kB
  • After minification 471.9 kB
  • After compression 407.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 64.0 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 69.4 kB
  • After minification 69.4 kB
  • After compression 66.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Netlibsecurity.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (71%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Net Lib Security. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

netlibsecurity.com

netlibsecurity.com

263 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

82 ms

js

js

145 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

43 ms

front.min.css

front.min.css

65 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

68 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

73 ms

front.css

front.css

77 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

36 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

74 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

75 ms

smartslider.min.css

smartslider.min.css

92 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

98 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

26 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

105 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

101 ms

front.js

front.js

92 ms

n2.min.js

n2.min.js

126 ms

smartslider-frontend.min.js

smartslider-frontend.min.js

147 ms

ss-simple.min.js

ss-simple.min.js

96 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

33 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

98 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

124 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

125 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

141 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

141 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

140 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

142 ms

api.js

api.js

32 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

26 ms

bootstrap-hover-dropdown.min.js

bootstrap-hover-dropdown.min.js

142 ms

plugins.min.js

plugins.min.js

172 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

173 ms

hotjar-3090688.js

hotjar-3090688.js

171 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

45 ms

SiteLogo.png

SiteLogo.png

51 ms

64-facebook.png

64-facebook.png

51 ms

64-twitter.png

64-twitter.png

110 ms

64-linkedin.png

64-linkedin.png

52 ms

bg-netlib-logo.jpg

bg-netlib-logo.jpg

154 ms

Netlib-Home-Screen-Draft-1.png

Netlib-Home-Screen-Draft-1.png

305 ms

icon-healthcare-1.png

icon-healthcare-1.png

153 ms

computer2-e1564604965198.png

computer2-e1564604965198.png

153 ms

icon-app-developer.png

icon-app-developer.png

153 ms

icon-government.png

icon-government.png

153 ms

icon-finance-1.png

icon-finance-1.png

155 ms

icon-business-1.png

icon-business-1.png

155 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

93 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

102 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

45 ms

modules.8da33a8f469c3b5ffcec.js

modules.8da33a8f469c3b5ffcec.js

18 ms

li_sync

li_sync

14 ms

Accessibility Review

netlibsecurity.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

netlibsecurity.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

netlibsecurity.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Netlibsecurity.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Netlibsecurity.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

netlibsecurity.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Net Lib Security. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: