Tools & Wizards About Us
netowl.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    48% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

netowl.com

NetOwl® — AI-based Text Analytics and Identity Analytics for Big Data

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

30 ms

Resources Loaded

948 ms

Page Rendered

532 ms

netowl.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Net Owl content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about netowl.com

NetOwl is a suite of AI-based entity extraction, sentiment analysis, name matching, and identity resolution tools for Big Data

Visit netowl.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Netowl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 30 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

netowl.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

49/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,420 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.9 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

netowl.com

30 ms

www.netowl.com

37 ms

gtm.js

159 ms

script.js

65 ms

style.min.css

16 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Netowl.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.rawgit.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (587 ms) relates to the external source Log.cookieyes.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 73.5 kB (9%)

Content Size

818.0 kB

After Optimization

744.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Netowl.com main page is 818.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 541.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 62.8 kB

  • Original 74.9 kB
  • After minification 57.1 kB
  • After compression 12.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.8 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 541.0 kB
  • After minification 536.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Net Owl images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 841 B

  • Original 132.2 kB
  • After minification 132.2 kB
  • After compression 131.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 69.9 kB
  • After minification 69.9 kB
  • After compression 64.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Netowl.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (61%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Net Owl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

netowl.com

netowl.com

30 ms

www.netowl.com

www.netowl.com

37 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

159 ms

script.js

script.js

65 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

16 ms

styles.css

styles.css

40 ms

pagenavi-css.css

pagenavi-css.css

40 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

43 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css

41 ms

jquery.mmenu.css

jquery.mmenu.css

38 ms

style.css

style.css

42 ms

aos.css

aos.css

154 ms

jquery.lazyloadxt.fadein.css

jquery.lazyloadxt.fadein.css

57 ms

a3_lazy_load.min.css

a3_lazy_load.min.css

56 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

60 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

54 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

57 ms

index.js

index.js

57 ms

index.js

index.js

142 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

143 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js

143 ms

jquery.mmenu.js

jquery.mmenu.js

144 ms

script.js

script.js

144 ms

highlight.min.js

highlight.min.js

147 ms

aos.js

aos.js

141 ms

jquery.lazyloadxt.extra.min.js

jquery.lazyloadxt.extra.min.js

145 ms

jquery.lazyloadxt.srcset.min.js

jquery.lazyloadxt.srcset.min.js

144 ms

jquery.lazyloadxt.extend.js

jquery.lazyloadxt.extend.js

144 ms

api.js

api.js

187 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

146 ms

index.js

index.js

145 ms

log

log

587 ms

css

css

129 ms

aos.js

aos.js

108 ms

aos.css

aos.css

102 ms

logo.png

logo.png

222 ms

banner.png

banner.png

198 ms

icon-banner2.png

icon-banner2.png

194 ms

icon-banner1.png

icon-banner1.png

192 ms

14.png

14.png

193 ms

12.png

12.png

194 ms

11.png

11.png

193 ms

13.png

13.png

194 ms

banner-middle-1252x300-min.png

banner-middle-1252x300-min.png

195 ms

shutterstock_637700587-1.png

shutterstock_637700587-1.png

195 ms

istock-id1336906460.jpg

istock-id1336906460.jpg

197 ms

shutterstock_541695331.png

shutterstock_541695331.png

194 ms

istock-id861165876-sol1-min.jpg

istock-id861165876-sol1-min.jpg

197 ms

bg-lastest.png

bg-lastest.png

198 ms

sprite.png

sprite.png

195 ms

bg-contact.png

bg-contact.png

198 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

107 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

129 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

141 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

140 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

141 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX9-p7K4GLs.ttf

211 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

106 ms

netowl-icon.ttf

netowl-icon.ttf

89 ms

Accessibility Review

netowl.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

netowl.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

netowl.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Netowl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Netowl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

netowl.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Net Owl. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: