Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

netvigator.com

網上行 | 網上行家居寬頻

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

688 ms

Resources Loaded

689 ms

Page Rendered

70 ms

netvigator.com screenshot

About Website

Visit netvigator.com now to see the best up-to-date Netvigator content for Hong Kong and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about netvigator.com

網上行寬頻新標準, 將速度全面提升, 提供1G 至10G的選擇, 為今日、未來作好準備。

Visit netvigator.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Netvigator.com page load time and found that the first response time was 688 ms and then it took 759 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

netvigator.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value30.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,310 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value45.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

netvigator.com

688 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Netvigator.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (688 ms) belongs to the original domain Netvigator.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 762.0 kB (36%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Netvigator.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 2.0 kB
  • After minification 2.0 kB
  • After compression 840 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 58% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 312.0 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Netvigator needs image optimization as it can save up to 312.0 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 242.5 kB

  • Original 377.2 kB
  • After minification 334.1 kB
  • After compression 134.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 242.5 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 206.3 kB

  • Original 235.8 kB
  • After minification 213.8 kB
  • After compression 29.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Netvigator.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 206.3 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

netvigator.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

netvigator.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

netvigator.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Netvigator.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Netvigator.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Netvigator. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: