Tools & Wizards About Us
nexg.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

nexg.in

Nex-G Consultancy Services | Nex-G Exuberant Solutions Pvt Ltd

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

38 ms

Resources Loaded

977 ms

Page Rendered

492 ms

nexg.in screenshot

About Website

Visit nexg.in now to see the best up-to-date Nex G content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nexg.in

Nex-G Consultancy Services is a leading enterprise software development and outsourcing company in India. We provide offshore development services in the domain of mobile application, wireless technol...

Visit nexg.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Nexg.in page load time and found that the first response time was 38 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nexg.in performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

89/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

77/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value920 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.5 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nexg.in

38 ms

bootstrap.css

41 ms

font-awesome.css

49 ms

owl.carousel.css

26 ms

owl.theme.css

47 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Nexg.in, 13% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (802 ms) belongs to the original domain Nexg.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 40.7 kB (6%)

Content Size

657.0 kB

After Optimization

616.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Nexg.in main page is 657.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 412.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 20.4 kB

  • Original 25.6 kB
  • After minification 16.9 kB
  • After compression 5.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.6 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.7 kB

  • Original 412.7 kB
  • After minification 407.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nex G images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 11.8 kB

  • Original 187.0 kB
  • After minification 187.0 kB
  • After compression 175.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 31.8 kB
  • After minification 31.8 kB
  • After compression 28.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nexg.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (50%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nex G. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

nexg.in

nexg.in

38 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

41 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

49 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

26 ms

owl.theme.css

owl.theme.css

47 ms

style.css

style.css

17 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

39 ms

css

css

72 ms

css

css

93 ms

modernizr.custom.js

modernizr.custom.js

23 ms

js

js

68 ms

js

js

74 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

33 ms

jquery.1.11.1.js

jquery.1.11.1.js

27 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

48 ms

SmoothScroll.js

SmoothScroll.js

29 ms

jquery.isotope.js

jquery.isotope.js

34 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

45 ms

main.js

main.js

47 ms

nexg_innovations.mp4

nexg_innovations.mp4

802 ms

54 ms

04.jpg

04.jpg

55 ms

dddd.png

dddd.png

57 ms

d.png

d.png

23 ms

dd.png

dd.png

55 ms

linde.png

linde.png

56 ms

pitney_bowes.png

pitney_bowes.png

56 ms

radisys.png

radisys.png

59 ms

knorr.png

knorr.png

59 ms

ericsson.png

ericsson.png

58 ms

intels.png

intels.png

59 ms

chevron.png

chevron.png

65 ms

con.jpg

con.jpg

64 ms

05.jpg

05.jpg

157 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

8 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

20 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

21 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

21 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

20 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

99 ms

Accessibility Review

nexg.in accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

nexg.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

nexg.in SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nexg.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nexg.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

nexg.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nex G. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: