5.2 sec in total
1.5 sec
3.3 sec
344 ms
Click here to check amazing Next I T content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about next-it.net
Next I.T. provides quality IT services to businesses all over Michigan. We do cybersecurity, backup and disaster recovery & more. Call now!
Visit next-it.netWe analyzed Next-it.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
next-it.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.1 s
1/100
10%
Value332.5 s
0/100
25%
Value18.6 s
0/100
10%
Value4,990 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.047
99/100
15%
Value35.0 s
0/100
10%
1517 ms
55 ms
80 ms
80 ms
74 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Next-it.net, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Next-it.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (44%)
3.3 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Next-it.net main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 103.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 103.7 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Next I T images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 363.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 363.6 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 970.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Next-it.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 970.3 kB or 91% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (53%)
74
35
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Next I T. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.next-it.net
1517 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
55 ms
layout.css
80 ms
settings.css
80 ms
style.css
74 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
78 ms
font-awesome.min.css
8 ms
style2.css
81 ms
custom.css
88 ms
js_composer_front_custom.css
182 ms
formreset.min.css
123 ms
formsmain.min.css
124 ms
readyclass.min.css
128 ms
browsers.min.css
131 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.css
129 ms
jquery.js
228 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
163 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
244 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
165 ms
uniform.js
171 ms
responsive.js
242 ms
gf.placeholders.js
243 ms
responsive.css
257 ms
css
22 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
245 ms
superfish.min.js
277 ms
fitvids.js
279 ms
jquery.parallax.js
279 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
280 ms
js_composer_front.js
280 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.7.min.js
280 ms
jquery.easing.pack.js
281 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
280 ms
jquery.metadata.pack.js
281 ms
vaxion.js
19 ms
swap.js
79 ms
conversion.js
18 ms
css
12 ms
analytics.js
58 ms
WidgetScript
605 ms
hpimage.png
109 ms
logo2.png
46 ms
facebook.png
46 ms
twitter.png
44 ms
linkedin.png
45 ms
gplus.png
46 ms
pinterest.png
47 ms
rss.png
105 ms
need-it-transparent1.png
105 ms
hack-img2.jpg
155 ms
techtipslide1.jpg
156 ms
locationslide.jpg
444 ms
repairslide.jpg
444 ms
designslide1.jpg
445 ms
hpbg.jpg
589 ms
nexes-img.jpg
444 ms
edgewater-img.jpg
445 ms
hackley-img.jpg
444 ms
Coverbook.png
476 ms
support.png
445 ms
partner3.jpg
446 ms
srpthumb-p13565-50x50-no.jpg
446 ms
srpthumb-p13558-50x50-no.jpg
474 ms
collect
32 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
49 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
49 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
338 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
51 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
338 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
5 ms
alert-overlay.png
367 ms
251 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
172 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
173 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
175 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
173 ms
swap_session.js
201 ms
in.php
220 ms
106 ms
coloredbg.png
63 ms
loader.gif
62 ms
revicons.woff
63 ms
_WidgetJPCB0
84 ms
next-it.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
next-it.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
next-it.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Next-it.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Next-it.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
next-it.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Next I T. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: