732 ms in total
101 ms
463 ms
168 ms
Visit next-mark.com now to see the best up-to-date Next Mark content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about next-mark.com
We are a Digital Marketing Agency in Sarasota, Florida, focused on igniting growth in your business. We provide SEO, Paid Search, Social Media Ads, and Web Design. Your business deserves an agency tha...
Visit next-mark.comWe analyzed Next-mark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 101 ms and then it took 631 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
next-mark.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value3.5 s
63/100
25%
Value17.8 s
0/100
10%
Value660 ms
45/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value23.6 s
1/100
10%
101 ms
29 ms
10 ms
20 ms
19 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Next-mark.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (193 ms) belongs to the original domain Next-mark.com.
Page size can be reduced by 283.1 kB (4%)
6.7 MB
6.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Next-mark.com main page is 6.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 161.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Next Mark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 37.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 44.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Next-mark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.2 kB or 33% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (50%)
72
36
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Next Mark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
next-mark.com
101 ms
next-mark.com
29 ms
style.min.css
10 ms
4-layout.css
20 ms
styles.css
19 ms
settings.css
17 ms
fontello.css
19 ms
frontend.min.css
22 ms
flatpickr.min.css
19 ms
select2.min.css
39 ms
bootstrap.min.css
31 ms
font-awesome-5.css
39 ms
v4-shims.min.css
43 ms
style.css
43 ms
animate.min.css
36 ms
css
64 ms
jquery.min.js
51 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
51 ms
rbtools.min.js
53 ms
rs6.min.js
52 ms
flatpickr.min.js
50 ms
select2.min.js
50 ms
rs6.css
53 ms
4-layout.js
55 ms
index.js
59 ms
index.js
54 ms
webfont.js
49 ms
mailoptin.min.js
55 ms
frontend.min.js
193 ms
bootstrap.min.js
56 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
55 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
56 ms
main.js
58 ms
api.js
193 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
59 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
58 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
60 ms
index.js
59 ms
css
28 ms
Soc-med-header-over-FB.png
61 ms
Soc-med-header-over-TW.png
61 ms
Soc-med-header-over-IG.png
63 ms
Soc-med-header-over-LI.png
62 ms
Soc-med-header-over-YT.png
61 ms
Next-Mark-Logo-WHITE-NoTag-e1525361284915.png
63 ms
nm-background-image-2021.jpg
69 ms
red-box.png
63 ms
blue-box.png
63 ms
black-box.png
64 ms
nm-whats-nextlogo.png
65 ms
NM_AboutUs_Icons_PieChart-e1525273566828.png
65 ms
NM_AboutUs_Icons_Pencil-e1525273585208.png
70 ms
NM_AboutUs_Icons_Nextwork-e1525273608592.png
66 ms
LN-PortfolioCover-Booth-c.jpg
67 ms
EL-Portfolio-Cover-c.png
73 ms
Cobb-Tryrone_home.jpg
70 ms
california-pizza-kitchen_thumb_o.jpg
68 ms
cityside_home.jpg
72 ms
JB-Portfolio.jpg
85 ms
DOCs-Collateral-portfolio-3.png
93 ms
Paragon-WebsiteMock1-1-e1508268334139.png
89 ms
cinebistro_home.jpg
86 ms
yarnall_home.jpg
86 ms
West-81-e1513354870543.png
89 ms
nuance_thumb_o.jpg
89 ms
Sarasota-Film-Fest_thumb_o.jpg
88 ms
marine_thumb_o.jpg
93 ms
microphone-e1433619051765-177x300.png
93 ms
Soc-med-footer-lg-FB.png
105 ms
Soc-med-footer-lg-TW.png
105 ms
Soc-med-footer-lg-IG.png
93 ms
Soc-med-footer-lg-LI.png
109 ms
Soc-med-footer-lg-YT.png
105 ms
font
79 ms
recaptcha__en.js
93 ms
next-mark.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
next-mark.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
next-mark.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Next-mark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Next-mark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
next-mark.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Next Mark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: