5.8 sec in total
295 ms
4.9 sec
590 ms
Welcome to next-play.net homepage info - get ready to check Next Play best content right away, or after learning these important things about next-play.net
Save time running youth sports tryouts and assessments using mobile devices. No more clipboards.
Visit next-play.netWe analyzed Next-play.net page load time and found that the first response time was 295 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Next-play.net rating and web reputation
next-play.net performance score
295 ms
1521 ms
1153 ms
755 ms
60 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Next-play.net, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) relates to the external source Nextplaysports.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (48%)
2.4 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Next-play.net main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 57.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 36.5 kB, which is 56% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 296.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Next Play needs image optimization as it can save up to 296.1 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 363.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 363.0 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 426.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Next-play.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 426.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (48%)
42
22
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Next Play. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.nextplaysports.net
295 ms
www.nextplaysports.net
1521 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1153 ms
icons.min.css
755 ms
css
60 ms
plugins.min.css
952 ms
style_new.css
628 ms
responsive.css
844 ms
orange.css
756 ms
NextPlayLogoHeader.png
1351 ms
Coach.jpg
1416 ms
NextPlayshowcase.png
1573 ms
feature1.jpg
1771 ms
feature2.jpg
1259 ms
feature5.png
1280 ms
jquery1.11.0.min.js
2256 ms
bootstrap.min.js
2147 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.min.js
1537 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
1606 ms
plugins.min.js
2133 ms
tweetie.min.js
1795 ms
videoplugins.min.js
1979 ms
custom.js
2473 ms
videobg.js
2143 ms
teamsnaplogo.jpg
2187 ms
trackfoot.png
2341 ms
TeamSnap-Logo.jpg
2406 ms
TFlogo-alt1.png
2273 ms
appstore.png
2313 ms
googleplay.png
2383 ms
kindle.png
2646 ms
app-screenshot1alt.jpg
2666 ms
app-screenshot2alt.jpg
2522 ms
app-screenshot3alt.jpg
2623 ms
analytics.js
71 ms
PvZdAvJ0jAY
124 ms
img-right.jpg
1452 ms
smartphone.png
1718 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
1631 ms
et-line.woff
1639 ms
collect
26 ms
collect
64 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
80 ms
www-embed-player.js
101 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
31 ms
ad_status.js
30 ms
4.jpg
211 ms
j6bam4kf
38 ms
intercom.b0452b60.js
31 ms
next-play.net SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Next-play.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Next-play.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
next-play.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Next Play. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: