1.1 sec in total
165 ms
806 ms
139 ms
Click here to check amazing Next Mark content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about nextmark.com
Our mission is simple: we help you successfully reach your market. That’s why NextMark is focused on giving you exactly what you need for successful media planning, media operations and media sales. F...
Visit nextmark.comWe analyzed Nextmark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 165 ms and then it took 945 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
nextmark.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
62/100
10%
Value4.2 s
44/100
25%
Value2.9 s
94/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.5 s
83/100
10%
165 ms
36 ms
115 ms
45 ms
114 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Nextmark.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (192 ms) belongs to the original domain Nextmark.com.
Page size can be reduced by 111.9 kB (12%)
948.6 kB
836.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Nextmark.com main page is 948.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 521.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 79.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.2 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Next Mark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nextmark.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 14% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (40%)
58
35
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Next Mark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.nextmark.com
165 ms
api.js
36 ms
js
115 ms
style.css
45 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
114 ms
style.min.css
129 ms
style.css
128 ms
style.css
126 ms
quotes-collection.css
127 ms
jquery.min.js
177 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
132 ms
quotes-collection.js
131 ms
jquery.js
190 ms
custom.js
175 ms
integrate.js
188 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
188 ms
comment-reply.min.js
188 ms
recaptcha__en.js
33 ms
bg_body.gif
76 ms
logo_nextmark.png
78 ms
bg_util.gif
79 ms
divider_util.gif
77 ms
icon_arrow_gray.gif
80 ms
icon_phone.png
80 ms
bg_call_today.png
81 ms
bg_nav.jpg
82 ms
icon_arrow_blue.gif
81 ms
bg_subnav_top.png
82 ms
button_search.gif
82 ms
bg_field_search.gif
82 ms
bg_search_dropdown.png
83 ms
nav_home2_on.png
89 ms
nav_home1.png
87 ms
nav_home3.png
86 ms
nav_home4.png
87 ms
photo_home2.jpg
159 ms
bg_all_about_relevance.png
97 ms
button_get_trial.png
104 ms
photo_home1.jpg
148 ms
bg_your_audience.png
106 ms
button_try_search.png
106 ms
photo_home3.jpg
145 ms
bg_accuracy_simple.png
132 ms
button_learn_more.png
132 ms
photo_home4.jpg
173 ms
bg_win_media_plan.png
158 ms
button_get_started.png
158 ms
bg_home_barkers.gif
169 ms
mailing-list-finder.png
173 ms
divider_horiz_pointer.gif
184 ms
thumb_newsletter.jpg
185 ms
bg_button_gold.gif
186 ms
icon_arrow_goldwhite.gif
192 ms
logo_nextmark_footer.gif
128 ms
bg_all_your_solutions.gif
127 ms
bg_contact_us.gif
138 ms
nav_home1_on.png
141 ms
nav_home3_on.png
132 ms
nav_home4_on.png
25 ms
nextmark.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
nextmark.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
nextmark.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nextmark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nextmark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nextmark.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Next Mark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: