2.7 sec in total
122 ms
1.7 sec
927 ms
Click here to check amazing Ngipl content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ngipl.in
Nextgen is well known SMS Marketing & IT Company. we offer bulk sms service in Delhi, India, Promotional SMS, Transactional sms, Web Develpement, SEO, SMO, PPC Services
Visit ngipl.inWe analyzed Ngipl.in page load time and found that the first response time was 122 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
ngipl.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value11.0 s
0/100
25%
Value12.4 s
3/100
10%
Value380 ms
69/100
30%
Value0.554
13/100
15%
Value13.1 s
12/100
10%
122 ms
236 ms
67 ms
80 ms
92 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (94 requests) were addressed to the original Ngipl.in, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (536 ms) belongs to the original domain Ngipl.in.
Page size can be reduced by 947.8 kB (36%)
2.6 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Ngipl.in main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.9 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 144.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ngipl images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 416.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 416.6 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 338.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ngipl.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 338.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (25%)
93
70
The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ngipl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ngipl.in
122 ms
www.ngipl.in
236 ms
css
67 ms
css
80 ms
css
92 ms
bootstrap.min.css
228 ms
font-awesome.min.css
138 ms
owl.carousel.css
97 ms
main.css
213 ms
style.css
123 ms
responsive.css
91 ms
settings.css
187 ms
modernizr.js
219 ms
jquery.min.js
225 ms
wow.min.js
131 ms
bootstrap.min.js
201 ms
own-menu.js
183 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
197 ms
jquery.countTo.js
259 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
243 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
223 ms
owl.carousel.js
266 ms
jquery.sticky.js
242 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
492 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
490 ms
main.js
279 ms
animate.css
242 ms
top-left-bar.jpg
115 ms
top-right-bar.jpg
117 ms
logo.png
118 ms
slide-bg-1.jpg
123 ms
bulk-sms.png
124 ms
slide-bg-2.jpg
531 ms
application-Devlopment-01.png
191 ms
webdesign-devlopment.png
192 ms
promotional%20sms.png
193 ms
img--1-1.png
189 ms
img--2-1.png
189 ms
bulk-sms-01.png
194 ms
mobility.png
198 ms
TRANSACTIONAL-SMS.png
514 ms
VIRTUAL%20PHONE%20NUMBER.png
511 ms
api-bulksms01.png
512 ms
webdesigndevlopment.png
515 ms
seo.png
513 ms
web-development.png
519 ms
ipad.jpg
526 ms
list-icon-1.png
519 ms
list-icon-2.png
522 ms
list-icon-3.png
523 ms
list-icon-4.png
526 ms
services-img.png
535 ms
bg-parallax.jpg
526 ms
work-folow-img.jpg
527 ms
flow-icon-1.png
529 ms
flow-icon-2.png
527 ms
flow-icon-3.png
529 ms
flow-icon-4.png
530 ms
img28.png
536 ms
img29.png
532 ms
img30.png
439 ms
img31.png
440 ms
img32.png
440 ms
img33.png
442 ms
img34.png
440 ms
img35.png
432 ms
img36.png
434 ms
fontawesome-webfont93e3.woff
437 ms
img37.png
367 ms
img38.png
368 ms
img39.png
370 ms
img40.png
368 ms
img41.png
368 ms
img42.png
364 ms
img43.png
111 ms
img44.png
105 ms
img45.png
108 ms
img46.png
128 ms
img47.png
255 ms
img48.png
258 ms
img49.png
256 ms
img50.png
253 ms
img51.png
254 ms
img52.png
250 ms
img53.png
260 ms
img54.png
274 ms
img56.png
262 ms
img57.png
272 ms
img58.png
272 ms
img59.png
272 ms
img60.png
275 ms
img62.png
290 ms
img61.png
303 ms
payments.png
350 ms
loader.gif
347 ms
timer.png
347 ms
revicons90c6.woff
260 ms
ngipl.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
ngipl.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
ngipl.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ngipl.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ngipl.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ngipl.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ngipl. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: