Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

nice-rack.com

Best Wakeboard Tower Mirror Arm | Boat Ski Mirror Arm - Nice Rack

Page Load Speed

7.4 sec in total

First Response

77 ms

Resources Loaded

6.6 sec

Page Rendered

664 ms

nice-rack.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to nice-rack.com homepage info - get ready to check Nice Rack best content right away, or after learning these important things about nice-rack.com

Transform your boat with this wakeboard tower mirror & boat ski mirror arm. Our products are manufactured in house with the highest quality control.

Visit nice-rack.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nice-rack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 77 ms and then it took 7.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nice-rack.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value34.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.8 s

24/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

73/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.3 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nice-rack.com

77 ms

nice-rack.com

5803 ms

wc-square-cart-checkout-blocks.min.css

17 ms

wpmenucart-icons.min.css

19 ms

wpmenucart-main.min.css

22 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Nice-rack.com, 16% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Nice-rack.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 394.4 kB (6%)

Content Size

6.4 MB

After Optimization

6.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Nice-rack.com main page is 6.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 88.2 kB

  • Original 105.9 kB
  • After minification 103.0 kB
  • After compression 17.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 224 B

  • Original 5.6 MB
  • After minification 5.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nice Rack images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 259.0 kB

  • Original 520.9 kB
  • After minification 520.9 kB
  • After compression 262.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 259.0 kB or 50% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 47.1 kB

  • Original 172.4 kB
  • After minification 172.1 kB
  • After compression 125.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nice-rack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 47.1 kB or 27% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (82%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nice Rack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

nice-rack.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

nice-rack.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

nice-rack.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nice-rack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nice-rack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nice Rack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: