Report Summary

  • 89

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 51

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

nicepage.ru

Компьютерные уроки для начинающих

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

604 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

2 sec

nicepage.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit nicepage.ru now to see the best up-to-date Nicepage content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nicepage.ru

Бесплатная программа для создания сайтов, веб-дизайна, WordPress тем, Joomla шаблонов. Программа для Windows и Mac ОС, WordPress и Joomla расширений и плагинов, а так же онлайн редактор.

Visit nicepage.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Nicepage.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 604 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nicepage.ru performance score

89

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

78/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.8 s

89/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nicepage.ru

604 ms

nicepage.css

484 ms

home.css

228 ms

jquery.js

349 ms

nicepage.js

382 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Nicepage.ru, 18% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Nicepage.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (43%)

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Nicepage.ru main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 45.6 kB

  • Original 60.0 kB
  • After minification 54.4 kB
  • After compression 14.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 1.3 MB

  • Original 3.0 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Nicepage needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 44% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 32.8 kB
  • After minification 32.8 kB
  • After compression 32.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 78.2 kB
  • After minification 78.2 kB
  • After compression 73.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nicepage.ru has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nicepage. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

nicepage.ru accessibility score

51

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

nicepage.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

nicepage.ru SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nicepage.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Nicepage.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nicepage. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: