Tools & Wizards About Us
niffler.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

niffler.com

Company, Product & Service Naming Agency | NameStormers

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

35 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

niffler.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Niffler content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about niffler.com

NameStormers creates engaging, memorable company and product brand names for Fortune 500 companies to small startups.

Visit niffler.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Niffler.com page load time and found that the first response time was 35 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

niffler.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.6 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,050 ms

25/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.061

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.4 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

niffler.com

35 ms

www.namestormers.com

119 ms

www.namestormers.com

228 ms

uc-block.bundle.js

40 ms

loader.js

28 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Niffler.com, 91% (58 requests) were made to Namestormers.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to App.usercentrics.eu. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (425 ms) relates to the external source Namestormers.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 432.3 kB (35%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

812.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Niffler.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 508.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 427.5 kB

  • Original 508.7 kB
  • After minification 505.1 kB
  • After compression 81.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 427.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 37 B

  • Original 251.7 kB
  • After minification 251.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Niffler images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 469.6 kB
  • After minification 469.6 kB
  • After compression 465.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 70 B

  • Original 14.9 kB
  • After minification 14.9 kB
  • After compression 14.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Niffler.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (49%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Niffler. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

niffler.com

niffler.com

35 ms

www.namestormers.com

www.namestormers.com

119 ms

www.namestormers.com

www.namestormers.com

228 ms

uc-block.bundle.js

uc-block.bundle.js

40 ms

loader.js

loader.js

28 ms

bundle.js

bundle.js

14 ms

246466791698.google-fonts.min.css

246466791698.google-fonts.min.css

33 ms

bb8643e4a2ca.google-fonts.min.css

bb8643e4a2ca.google-fonts.min.css

63 ms

script.js

script.js

37 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

137 ms

termageddon-usercentrics-ajax.min.js

termageddon-usercentrics-ajax.min.js

99 ms

2c8dbef90754.google-fonts.min.css

2c8dbef90754.google-fonts.min.css

98 ms

786e62e541b8.google-fonts.min.css

786e62e541b8.google-fonts.min.css

98 ms

8899592b14a6.google-fonts.min.css

8899592b14a6.google-fonts.min.css

99 ms

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

98 ms

jquery.easing.min.js

jquery.easing.min.js

128 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

127 ms

priority.js

priority.js

129 ms

transit.min.js

transit.min.js

129 ms

waypoints.js

waypoints.js

129 ms

imagesLoaded.min.js

imagesLoaded.min.js

394 ms

hoverintent.min.js

hoverintent.min.js

394 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

394 ms

touchswipe.min.js

touchswipe.min.js

394 ms

caroufredsel.min.js

caroufredsel.min.js

393 ms

anime.min.js

anime.min.js

395 ms

flickity.js

flickity.js

398 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

395 ms

init.js

init.js

425 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

396 ms

pminstantpage.min.js

pminstantpage.min.js

396 ms

public.js

public.js

399 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

398 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

253 ms

NameStormers-TM.png

NameStormers-TM.png

215 ms

NameStormers-TM@2x.png

NameStormers-TM@2x.png

215 ms

PP-Black-Logo.png

PP-Black-Logo.png

216 ms

Clouds.jpg

Clouds.jpg

275 ms

Client-16-Color.png

Client-16-Color.png

216 ms

AHA-1.png

AHA-1.png

271 ms

Client-10-Color.png

Client-10-Color.png

271 ms

motorola.png

motorola.png

272 ms

Client-12-Color.png

Client-12-Color.png

273 ms

Client-14-Color.png

Client-14-Color.png

274 ms

Pearson.png

Pearson.png

275 ms

coca-cola-3.png

coca-cola-3.png

274 ms

Client-13-Color.png

Client-13-Color.png

275 ms

hilton-2-copy.png

hilton-2-copy.png

282 ms

nature-sweet-copy.png

nature-sweet-copy.png

284 ms

Client-11-Color.png

Client-11-Color.png

283 ms

Casper-1-copy-2.png

Casper-1-copy-2.png

286 ms

HM2-copy.png

HM2-copy.png

287 ms

Client-15-Color.png

Client-15-Color.png

287 ms

CVS-copy-4.png

CVS-copy-4.png

302 ms

Nestle-copy-1.png

Nestle-copy-1.png

307 ms

NameStormers-cover.png

NameStormers-cover.png

334 ms

Hubbell.jpeg

Hubbell.jpeg

217 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

229 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

167 ms

greg-buscetto-color-min-895x675-1.jpg

greg-buscetto-color-min-895x675-1.jpg

185 ms

talking-rain.jpeg

talking-rain.jpeg

185 ms

pepsico-logo.jpg

pepsico-logo.jpg

196 ms

04-4-Orange.jpg

04-4-Orange.jpg

195 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

74 ms

Accessibility Review

niffler.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

niffler.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

niffler.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Niffler.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Niffler.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

niffler.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Niffler. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: