1.5 sec in total
227 ms
975 ms
298 ms
Visit nifl.com now to see the best up-to-date NIF L content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nifl.com
Sanitary Castings like square, round and rectangular manhole covers, gratings, surface boxes and meter boxes
Visit nifl.comWe analyzed Nifl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 227 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
nifl.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
82/100
10%
Value2.7 s
86/100
25%
Value2.8 s
95/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value2.1 s
99/100
10%
227 ms
134 ms
80 ms
80 ms
222 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Nifl.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (432 ms) belongs to the original domain Nifl.com.
Page size can be reduced by 83.4 kB (22%)
374.2 kB
290.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Nifl.com main page is 374.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 257.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.9 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. NIF L images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 60.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 60.8 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nifl.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (16%)
44
37
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of NIF L. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
nifl.com
227 ms
style.css
134 ms
jquery.js
80 ms
menu.js
80 ms
jquery.min.js
222 ms
slides.min.jquery.js
113 ms
slide.js
85 ms
head.jpg
67 ms
header-bg.gif
116 ms
logo.gif
89 ms
dnv.gif
64 ms
menu-left-bg.gif
71 ms
menu-mid-bg.gif
81 ms
menu-border.gif
108 ms
menu-right-bg.gif
119 ms
banner-bg.jpg
164 ms
nifl.png
142 ms
arrow.png
149 ms
banner.jpg
265 ms
banner1.jpg
193 ms
banner2.jpg
213 ms
banner3.jpg
188 ms
banner4.jpg
194 ms
banner5.jpg
219 ms
banner6.jpg
240 ms
pro-bg.gif
253 ms
pro-bg1.gif
243 ms
pro-box.gif
262 ms
manhole.gif
306 ms
arrow1.gif
303 ms
channel.gif
289 ms
surface.gif
303 ms
meter.gif
321 ms
valve.gif
324 ms
decorative.gif
350 ms
agricultural.gif
353 ms
industrial.gif
376 ms
counter.gif
358 ms
accsesories.gif
391 ms
plastic.gif
379 ms
automobile.gif
432 ms
extensions.gif
417 ms
pipe.gif
426 ms
fabricated.gif
376 ms
foot.jpg
389 ms
banner.jpg
409 ms
loading.gif
391 ms
pagination.png
400 ms
nifl.com accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
nifl.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
nifl.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nifl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Nifl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nifl.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of NIF L. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: