4.5 sec in total
405 ms
3.6 sec
435 ms
Visit nineteen.design now to see the best up-to-date Nineteen content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nineteen.design
Add a description about your page or projects. Should be around 135 to 160 characters.
Visit nineteen.designWe analyzed Nineteen.design page load time and found that the first response time was 405 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
nineteen.design performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
9/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value7.8 s
24/100
10%
Value110 ms
98/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.8 s
56/100
10%
405 ms
1037 ms
135 ms
270 ms
400 ms
Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Nineteen.design, 7% (2 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 4% (1 request) were made to P.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Nineteen.design.
Page size can be reduced by 71.3 kB (4%)
2.0 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Nineteen.design main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 46 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nineteen images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 192 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nineteen.design has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (59%)
22
9
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nineteen. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
nineteen.design
405 ms
www.nineteen.design
1037 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
135 ms
style.min.css
270 ms
style.css
400 ms
frontend.min.css
540 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
402 ms
jquery.js
555 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
402 ms
erf0abl.css
176 ms
shared.scripts.min.js
692 ms
frontend.scripts.min.js
803 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
689 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
570 ms
frontend.min.js
689 ms
wp-embed.min.js
688 ms
p.css
28 ms
LOG-002-xxx-03-1.svg
174 ms
LOG-SUISSE-004.svg
274 ms
16x9-1200-WON-big.jpg
903 ms
8x9-1200-APO-big.jpg
775 ms
8x9-1200-PRC-big.jpg
376 ms
16x9-1200-PPL-big.jpg
801 ms
16x9-1200-GRV-big.jpg
765 ms
d
41 ms
SuisseIntl-Regular-WebTrial.woff
218 ms
SuisseIntlBold.otf
490 ms
nineteen.design accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
nineteen.design best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
nineteen.design SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nineteen.design can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Russian language. Our system also found out that Nineteen.design main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nineteen.design
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nineteen. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: