Tools & Wizards About Us
nofeebankcard.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

nofeebankcard.com

Page Load Speed

1000 ms in total

First Response

54 ms

Resources Loaded

788 ms

Page Rendered

158 ms

nofeebankcard.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to nofeebankcard.com homepage info - get ready to check Nofeebankcard best content right away, or after learning these important things about nofeebankcard.com

Forsale Lander

Visit nofeebankcard.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nofeebankcard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 54 ms and then it took 946 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nofeebankcard.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

76/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.9 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value23,750 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nofeebankcard.com

54 ms

nofeebankcard.com

200 ms

uxcore2.min.css

192 ms

noheader.min.css

236 ms

c9302e26756e1a9a.css

84 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Nofeebankcard.com, 62% (16 requests) were made to Afternic.com and 27% (7 requests) were made to Img6.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (419 ms) relates to the external source Afternic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 64.5 kB (46%)

Content Size

141.0 kB

After Optimization

76.5 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Nofeebankcard.com main page is 141.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 98.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 60.3 kB

  • Original 98.8 kB
  • After minification 98.8 kB
  • After compression 38.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.3 kB or 61% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 388 B

  • Original 4.8 kB
  • After minification 4.8 kB
  • After compression 4.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 37.3 kB
  • After minification 37.1 kB
  • After compression 33.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nofeebankcard.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (92%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nofeebankcard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

nofeebankcard.com

nofeebankcard.com

54 ms

nofeebankcard.com

nofeebankcard.com

200 ms

uxcore2.min.css

uxcore2.min.css

192 ms

noheader.min.css

noheader.min.css

236 ms

c9302e26756e1a9a.css

c9302e26756e1a9a.css

84 ms

f3d7d266c35baf54.css

f3d7d266c35baf54.css

163 ms

8210b14763457e23.css

8210b14763457e23.css

147 ms

polyfills-5cd94c89d3acac5f.js

polyfills-5cd94c89d3acac5f.js

145 ms

webpack-008ffa3c98fc8544.js

webpack-008ffa3c98fc8544.js

145 ms

main-999f8182f179b553.js

main-999f8182f179b553.js

161 ms

framework-f7ba292b22b03fed.js

framework-f7ba292b22b03fed.js

178 ms

_app-74cd4fb80f14b27b.js

_app-74cd4fb80f14b27b.js

301 ms

670-e807ace496afef9f.js

670-e807ace496afef9f.js

200 ms

584-84fd276034ffe4bd.js

584-84fd276034ffe4bd.js

200 ms

787-b8887dd5c5d965da.js

787-b8887dd5c5d965da.js

419 ms

%5Bdomain%5D-0c2aac4ebf4cce77.js

%5Bdomain%5D-0c2aac4ebf4cce77.js

290 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

392 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

290 ms

_middlewareManifest.js

_middlewareManifest.js

291 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

291 ms

uxcore2.min.js

uxcore2.min.js

198 ms

vendor~uxcore2.min.js

vendor~uxcore2.min.js

285 ms

heartbeat.js

heartbeat.js

222 ms

noheader.min.js

noheader.min.js

283 ms

aksb.min.js

aksb.min.js

267 ms

utag.js

utag.js

202 ms

Accessibility Review

nofeebankcard.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

nofeebankcard.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

nofeebankcard.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nofeebankcard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nofeebankcard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

nofeebankcard.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nofeebankcard. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: