Tools & Wizards About Us
nonabox.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 82

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 82% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

nonabox.de

Besten Abo Boxen für Frauen ❤️ Test & Vergleich

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

322 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

537 ms

nonabox.de screenshot

About Website

Welcome to nonabox.de homepage info - get ready to check Non Abo X best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about nonabox.de

Wenn man große Pakete bekommt, deren Inhalt man nicht kennt, fühlt man sich wie an Weihnachten. Ein kleines Geschenk, eine

Visit nonabox.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Nonabox.de page load time and found that the first response time was 322 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nonabox.de performance score

82

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

67/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.07

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.7 s

91/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nonabox.de

322 ms

abo-boxen-frauen-1232

808 ms

layout.css

111 ms

custom.css

211 ms

widget.css

228 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Nonabox.de, 95% (21 requests) were made to Online-shopping-blog.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (863 ms) relates to the external source Online-shopping-blog.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 187.6 kB (22%)

Content Size

866.1 kB

After Optimization

678.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Nonabox.de main page is 866.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 650.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 20.0 kB

  • Original 28.7 kB
  • After minification 28.1 kB
  • After compression 8.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.0 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 36.6 kB

  • Original 650.2 kB
  • After minification 613.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Non Abo X images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 97.7 kB

  • Original 144.7 kB
  • After minification 144.6 kB
  • After compression 47.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 97.7 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 33.4 kB

  • Original 42.5 kB
  • After minification 33.4 kB
  • After compression 9.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nonabox.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 33.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (50%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Non Abo X. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

nonabox.de

nonabox.de

322 ms

abo-boxen-frauen-1232

abo-boxen-frauen-1232

808 ms

layout.css

layout.css

111 ms

custom.css

custom.css

211 ms

widget.css

widget.css

228 ms

screen.css

screen.css

228 ms

tablepress-combined.min.css

tablepress-combined.min.css

229 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

368 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

229 ms

form.js

form.js

315 ms

related.css

related.css

314 ms

front.js

front.js

315 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

317 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

107 ms

shopping.jpg

shopping.jpg

251 ms

abo-boxen-frauen.jpg

abo-boxen-frauen.jpg

229 ms

glossybox.jpg

glossybox.jpg

561 ms

pinkbox.jpg

pinkbox.jpg

216 ms

brigitte-box.png

brigitte-box.png

863 ms

luxury-box.jpg

luxury-box.jpg

213 ms

nonabox.png

nonabox.png

228 ms

submit-bg.gif

submit-bg.gif

327 ms

Accessibility Review

nonabox.de accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

nonabox.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

nonabox.de SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nonabox.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nonabox.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

nonabox.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Non Abo X. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: