5.9 sec in total
359 ms
5.4 sec
160 ms
Visit noname-group.com now to see the best up-to-date No Name Group content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about noname-group.com
It dissolves lime in all plants, prevents the new formation, removes biofilm favoring the elimination of Legionella and amoeba.
Visit noname-group.comWe analyzed Noname-group.com page load time and found that the first response time was 359 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
noname-group.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.1 s
0/100
10%
Value31.7 s
0/100
25%
Value24.7 s
0/100
10%
Value570 ms
52/100
30%
Value0.295
40/100
15%
Value24.5 s
0/100
10%
359 ms
1010 ms
143 ms
273 ms
358 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Noname-group.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.iubenda.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Noname-group.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (33%)
5.0 MB
3.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Noname-group.com main page is 5.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 78.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 78.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 278.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. No Name Group images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Noname-group.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (79%)
61
13
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of No Name Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
noname-group.com
359 ms
1010 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
143 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
273 ms
custom-styles.css
358 ms
layerslider.css
380 ms
styles.css
382 ms
settings.css
382 ms
front-legacy.css
381 ms
dashicons.min.css
517 ms
thickbox.css
510 ms
uncode-privacy-public.css
520 ms
theme-styles.min.css
645 ms
theme-icons.min.css
641 ms
css
46 ms
style.css
517 ms
custom.css
644 ms
jquery.js
770 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
652 ms
greensock.js
1013 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
1009 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
887 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1016 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
908 ms
head-scripts.js
902 ms
js
69 ms
iubenda_cons.js
34 ms
iubenda_cs.js
35 ms
sow-slider-default-9bba1f830749.css
1012 ms
slider.css
1033 ms
underscore.min.js
1044 ms
daves-wordpress-live-search.js
1151 ms
scripts.js
1148 ms
thickbox.js
1150 ms
js-cookie.min.js
1147 ms
uncode-privacy-public.min.js
1161 ms
core.min.js
1178 ms
widget.min.js
1280 ms
tabs.min.js
1292 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1289 ms
scripts-vendors.js
1663 ms
wpml-fix.js
1293 ms
smoothscroll.js
1181 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1154 ms
jquerytransit.js
1080 ms
styling-291.min.js
1055 ms
jquery.cycle.min.js
1052 ms
jquery.slider.min.js
1073 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
1179 ms
theme-styles.min-blessed1.css
929 ms
1.png
141 ms
LOG_NONAME_SMALL_PNG.png
147 ms
logo-footer-1.png
145 ms
001_SLIDE-HOME-en.png
847 ms
002_SLIDE-HOME-en.png
542 ms
003_SLIDE-HOME-en.png
165 ms
004_SLIDE-HOME-en.png
559 ms
ICO_NONAME_PNG-1.png
281 ms
logo-footer.png
284 ms
core-fcf8c9eac36aece9d290934b54a63296.js
107 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
93 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf
96 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
105 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
112 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
117 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
112 ms
theme-icons.woff
264 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
309 ms
8097084.js
128 ms
iframe_bridge.html
99 ms
slider.woff
131 ms
noname-group.com accessibility score
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
noname-group.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
noname-group.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Noname-group.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Noname-group.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
noname-group.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of No Name Group. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: