Tools & Wizards About Us
norfolklive.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

norfolklive.co.uk

Norfolk - Cambridgeshire Live

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

142 ms

Resources Loaded

915 ms

Page Rendered

265 ms

norfolklive.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit norfolklive.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Norfolk Live content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about norfolklive.co.uk

Norfolk is the the largest county in East Anglia and is bordered by Cambridgeshire, Suffolk and Lincolnshire. It has 90 miles of coastline with thousands flocking there every year to enjoy the golden ...

Visit norfolklive.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Norfolklive.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 142 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

norfolklive.co.uk performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

60/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.8 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,480 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.131

81/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value31.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

norfolklive.co.uk

142 ms

www.norfolklive.co.uk

24 ms

norfolk

36 ms

section-base.css

77 ms

chameleon-static-html.css

72 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Norfolklive.co.uk, 48% (24 requests) were made to S2-prod.cambridge-news.co.uk and 4% (2 requests) were made to Cmp.inmobi.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (551 ms) relates to the external source Cmp.inmobi.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 304.5 kB (17%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Norfolklive.co.uk main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 270.9 kB

  • Original 324.7 kB
  • After minification 324.0 kB
  • After compression 53.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 270.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 6.0 kB

  • Original 34.5 kB
  • After minification 28.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Norfolk Live needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.0 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 26.6 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB
  • After compression 1.3 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 984 B

  • Original 46.3 kB
  • After minification 46.3 kB
  • After compression 45.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Norfolklive.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (84%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Norfolk Live. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

norfolklive.co.uk

norfolklive.co.uk

142 ms

www.norfolklive.co.uk

www.norfolklive.co.uk

24 ms

norfolk

norfolk

36 ms

section-base.css

section-base.css

77 ms

chameleon-static-html.css

chameleon-static-html.css

72 ms

marwood-extended.css

marwood-extended.css

80 ms

brand-extended-clipper.2793397b83b1da53.css

brand-extended-clipper.2793397b83b1da53.css

84 ms

css2

css2

81 ms

9e12cac6e27139b509af9a4595fbd8879785ac8adef06fbc37d853850f2ebd91

9e12cac6e27139b509af9a4595fbd8879785ac8adef06fbc37d853850f2ebd91

136 ms

s.min.js

s.min.js

123 ms

runForceReconsent.min.js

runForceReconsent.min.js

123 ms

pwt.js

pwt.js

135 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

279 ms

iasPET.1.js

iasPET.1.js

126 ms

prebid-test.js

prebid-test.js

135 ms

tags.min.js

tags.min.js

131 ms

pug-runtime.min.js

pug-runtime.min.js

124 ms

section.min.js

section.min.js

184 ms

section.min.js

section.min.js

184 ms

partner.min.js

partner.min.js

184 ms

chameleon-static-html.min.js

chameleon-static-html.min.js

181 ms

withnail.min.js

withnail.min.js

184 ms

ats.js

ats.js

181 ms

smile-web.min.js

smile-web.min.js

181 ms

style.css

style.css

183 ms

index.js

index.js

184 ms

auth-ui.min.js

auth-ui.min.js

194 ms

analytics.js.gz

analytics.js.gz

126 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

315 ms

choice.js

choice.js

551 ms

apstag.js

apstag.js

95 ms

analytics.config.json

analytics.config.json

393 ms

transparent.png

transparent.png

20 ms

section.css

section.css

82 ms

withnail.css

withnail.css

74 ms

section.css

section.css

76 ms

logo-cambridgenews.ee6a2d745fbaec54.png

logo-cambridgenews.ee6a2d745fbaec54.png

73 ms

logo-cambridgenews.png

logo-cambridgenews.png

78 ms

css2

css2

53 ms

ipso.a49db49dfe703ca7.svg

ipso.a49db49dfe703ca7.svg

40 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

33 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

41 ms

icomoon.00495dd3fc67aad5.woff

icomoon.00495dd3fc67aad5.woff

25 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

95 ms

js

js

107 ms

door.js

door.js

183 ms

verify-2.0.1.min.js

verify-2.0.1.min.js

172 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

164 ms

adsm.macro.7b4cd01e-58e4-4d3c-b14d-9c15d2911c60.js

adsm.macro.7b4cd01e-58e4-4d3c-b14d-9c15d2911c60.js

187 ms

cmp2-polyfilled.js

cmp2-polyfilled.js

7 ms

Accessibility Review

norfolklive.co.uk accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

norfolklive.co.uk best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

norfolklive.co.uk SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Norfolklive.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Norfolklive.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

norfolklive.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Norfolk Live. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: