6.5 sec in total
1.1 sec
5.3 sec
181 ms
Click here to check amazing Norpack content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about norpack.in
Visit norpack.inWe analyzed Norpack.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
norpack.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.5 s
0/100
10%
Value11.5 s
0/100
25%
Value23.5 s
0/100
10%
Value190 ms
91/100
30%
Value0.254
49/100
15%
Value23.7 s
1/100
10%
1070 ms
520 ms
495 ms
1330 ms
518 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Norpack.in, 17% (5 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Translate.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Norpack.in.
Page size can be reduced by 128.3 kB (5%)
2.5 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Norpack.in main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 6.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.7 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Norpack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 63.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 63.7 kB or 35% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Norpack.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.9 kB or 65% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (18%)
28
23
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Norpack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
norpack.in
1070 ms
style.css
520 ms
mobile-responsive.css
495 ms
jquery-1.9.1.min.js
1330 ms
slideshow.js
518 ms
element.js
33 ms
norpack-logo.png
303 ms
mobicon.png
302 ms
close.png
275 ms
pvc_conduit_pipes.png
289 ms
pvc_conduit_fitting.png
526 ms
isi-marks.png
812 ms
translateelement.css
62 ms
main.js
105 ms
glober.ttf
1246 ms
slide3.png
2500 ms
slide2.png
2068 ms
slide1.png
2721 ms
download-icon.png
679 ms
li-arrow.png
940 ms
facebook-hover.png
972 ms
twitter-hover.png
1201 ms
linkedin-hover.png
1238 ms
gplus-hover.png
1395 ms
blogger-hover.png
1485 ms
element_main.js
34 ms
translate_24dp.png
45 ms
l
40 ms
cleardot.gif
67 ms
te_ctrl3.gif
10 ms
norpack.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
norpack.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
norpack.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Norpack.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Norpack.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
norpack.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Norpack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: