Tools & Wizards About Us
nostalgiceyecare.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

nostalgiceyecare.com

Optometry Services | Nostalgic Eye Care | Philadelphia

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

117 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

67 ms

nostalgiceyecare.com screenshot

About Website

Visit nostalgiceyecare.com now to see the best up-to-date Nostalgic Eye Care content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nostalgiceyecare.com

Welcome to Nostalgic Eye Care! We're proud to offer comprehensive eye care services, amazing eyeglasses, and more. Call and set up an appointment today!

Visit nostalgiceyecare.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nostalgiceyecare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 117 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nostalgiceyecare.com performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.2 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,760 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.nostalgiceyecare.com

117 ms

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

52 ms

minified.js

53 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

50 ms

polyfill.min.js

274 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Nostalgiceyecare.com, 35% (18 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 33% (17 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (418 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (51%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Nostalgiceyecare.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 966.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 778.6 kB

  • Original 966.1 kB
  • After minification 964.4 kB
  • After compression 187.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 778.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 281.5 kB

  • Original 958.8 kB
  • After minification 677.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Nostalgic Eye Care needs image optimization as it can save up to 281.5 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 102.2 kB

  • Original 347.3 kB
  • After minification 347.2 kB
  • After compression 245.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 102.2 kB or 29% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 56 B

  • Original 1.4 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nostalgiceyecare.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (35%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nostalgic Eye Care. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.nostalgiceyecare.com

www.nostalgiceyecare.com

117 ms

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

52 ms

minified.js

minified.js

53 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

50 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

274 ms

mobile-app-invite-banner.css

mobile-app-invite-banner.css

95 ms

mobile-app-invite-banner.umd.min.js

mobile-app-invite-banner.umd.min.js

97 ms

thunderbolt-commons.7c91a755.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.7c91a755.bundle.min.js

54 ms

main.8534eeb3.bundle.min.js

main.8534eeb3.bundle.min.js

54 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

55 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

56 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

58 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

57 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

58 ms

download.png

download.png

274 ms

white-email-icon-png-16.png

white-email-icon-png-16.png

275 ms

Front_Logo.png

Front_Logo.png

350 ms

combined-logo_mk3.png

combined-logo_mk3.png

369 ms

b7e951_4b48e8cc6f6a4cee8717fa83fd4094de~mv2_d_9882_5524_s_4_2.jpg

b7e951_4b48e8cc6f6a4cee8717fa83fd4094de~mv2_d_9882_5524_s_4_2.jpg

388 ms

white-logo.png

white-logo.png

351 ms

file.jpeg%202x

file.jpeg%202x

418 ms

nsplsh_495448714f6472726e3073~mv2_d_7952_5304_s_4_2.jpg

nsplsh_495448714f6472726e3073~mv2_d_7952_5304_s_4_2.jpg

275 ms

nsplsh_3561452d71625871475349~mv2_d_3024_4525_s_4_2.jpg

nsplsh_3561452d71625871475349~mv2_d_3024_4525_s_4_2.jpg

276 ms

008434_22dc09e4baf8485e811c1daefcc488cd~mv2.jpg

008434_22dc09e4baf8485e811c1daefcc488cd~mv2.jpg

277 ms

ae127673a1fe463b964ccf4f5f91ea3a.jpg

ae127673a1fe463b964ccf4f5f91ea3a.jpg

277 ms

nsplsh_5573414c4e646f6b326d34~mv2_d_4096_2730_s_4_2.jpg

nsplsh_5573414c4e646f6b326d34~mv2_d_4096_2730_s_4_2.jpg

278 ms

b7e951_4e099abdc1254581a9327414e1a13265~mv2.png

b7e951_4e099abdc1254581a9327414e1a13265~mv2.png

280 ms

Front_Logo.png

Front_Logo.png

375 ms

combined-logo_mk3.png

combined-logo_mk3.png

402 ms

file.jpeg

file.jpeg

298 ms

kEF4nGNgYgCDfxMZpjFgAyxAzMjAxMjEXpqXaWTg5AIAYwIEbQA=

kEF4nGNgYgCDfxMZpjFgAyxAzMjAxMjEXpqXaWTg5AIAYwIEbQA=

90 ms

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

89 ms

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

90 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

121 ms

file.woff

file.woff

239 ms

file.woff

file.woff

197 ms

110 ms

106 ms

113 ms

108 ms

104 ms

103 ms

134 ms

128 ms

133 ms

130 ms

131 ms

127 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

9 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

31 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

9 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

10 ms

Accessibility Review

nostalgiceyecare.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

nostalgiceyecare.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

nostalgiceyecare.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nostalgiceyecare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nostalgiceyecare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

nostalgiceyecare.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nostalgic Eye Care. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: