Tools & Wizards About Us
noternet.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 77

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 87% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

noternet.org

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

883 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

325 ms

noternet.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Noternet content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about noternet.org

Visit noternet.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Noternet.org page load time and found that the first response time was 883 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

noternet.org performance score

77

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

40/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.8 s

90/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

noternet.org

883 ms

style.css

108 ms

css

25 ms

5667860_quick-online-payday-loan.jpg

2487 ms

L8tbd3H6eSE

110 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 22% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Noternet.org, 39% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (2 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) relates to the external source Easy-loans2.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 359.4 kB (48%)

Content Size

752.1 kB

After Optimization

392.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Noternet.org main page is 752.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 271.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 9.9 kB

  • Original 15.5 kB
  • After minification 14.8 kB
  • After compression 5.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.9 kB or 64% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 653 B

  • Original 271.8 kB
  • After minification 271.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Noternet images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 135.5 kB

  • Original 207.0 kB
  • After minification 206.5 kB
  • After compression 71.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 135.5 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 213.4 kB

  • Original 257.7 kB
  • After minification 254.1 kB
  • After compression 44.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Noternet.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 213.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (40%)

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Noternet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

noternet.org

noternet.org

883 ms

style.css

style.css

108 ms

css

css

25 ms

5667860_quick-online-payday-loan.jpg

5667860_quick-online-payday-loan.jpg

2487 ms

L8tbd3H6eSE

L8tbd3H6eSE

110 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

81 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

66 ms

www-embed-player-vflRGs1ko.css

www-embed-player-vflRGs1ko.css

65 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

88 ms

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

38 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

34 ms

7XUFZ5tgS-tD6QamInJTcdGU7DQ8I6RFMlK0vgclk7w.woff

7XUFZ5tgS-tD6QamInJTcdGU7DQ8I6RFMlK0vgclk7w.woff

38 ms

anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wpr24bNCNEoFTpS2BTjF6FB5E.woff

anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wpr24bNCNEoFTpS2BTjF6FB5E.woff

48 ms

anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wpr3XqdloEk0Ij5qwGW4qO9RM.woff

anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wpr3XqdloEk0Ij5qwGW4qO9RM.woff

62 ms

anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wprx7IBmrqA5IG9z8WNe77b9o.woff

anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wprx7IBmrqA5IG9z8WNe77b9o.woff

69 ms

anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wpr0bathaSTBR2c4i13_wzlb0.woff

anMUvcNT0H1YN4FII8wpr0bathaSTBR2c4i13_wzlb0.woff

68 ms

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

63 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

76 ms

Accessibility Review

noternet.org accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

noternet.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

noternet.org SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Noternet.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Noternet.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

noternet.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Noternet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: