1.3 sec in total
302 ms
624 ms
346 ms
Visit nsfgrfp.org now to see the best up-to-date NSF GRFP content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nsfgrfp.org
Visit nsfgrfp.orgWe analyzed Nsfgrfp.org page load time and found that the first response time was 302 ms and then it took 970 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
nsfgrfp.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.9 s
0/100
10%
Value14.3 s
0/100
25%
Value10.0 s
9/100
10%
Value250 ms
84/100
30%
Value0.014
100/100
15%
Value11.0 s
21/100
10%
302 ms
28 ms
33 ms
25 ms
53 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Nsfgrfp.org, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (302 ms) belongs to the original domain Nsfgrfp.org.
Page size can be reduced by 467.8 kB (24%)
2.0 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Nsfgrfp.org main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.9 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.2 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 165.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, NSF GRFP needs image optimization as it can save up to 165.2 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 229.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 229.5 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 60.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nsfgrfp.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 60.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (48%)
29
15
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of NSF GRFP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
nsfgrfp.org
302 ms
main.css
28 ms
mediaqueries.css
33 ms
responsiveslides.css
25 ms
GRFP_logo.png
53 ms
nsf-logo.png
74 ms
1.jpg
153 ms
4.jpg
148 ms
2.jpg
126 ms
3.jpg
136 ms
5.jpg
154 ms
jquery-latest.min-d72f455607dee33927d1f49d32f2135d.js
126 ms
jquery-ui.min-a50e53915cf0f994e793d496e47f0c60.js
212 ms
responsiveslides.min-452581ace2b5ae5db40203bbc61c6924.js
142 ms
contact_us-87cbcb63dc341a536fcbc44aa6d3ba09.js
146 ms
custom-8531301136fbf8f06dc98d393224a68f.js
152 ms
ASEE_Footer_logo.png
155 ms
ASEE_Footer_logo_print.png
290 ms
layout.css
151 ms
pages.css
151 ms
elements.css
155 ms
framework.css
157 ms
stylesheet.css
161 ms
font-awesome.min.css
162 ms
custom.css
165 ms
ga.js
27 ms
search.png
104 ms
dropdown_side.gif
15 ms
__utm.gif
25 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
33 ms
Caviar_Dreams_Bold-webfont.ttf
17 ms
themes.gif
11 ms
nsfgrfp.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
nsfgrfp.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
nsfgrfp.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nsfgrfp.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nsfgrfp.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
nsfgrfp.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of NSF GRFP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: