Tools & Wizards About Us
ntmg.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

ntmg.com

Nutmeg:Guest Experience Platform for Attraction & Experiences

Page Load Speed

12 sec in total

First Response

33 ms

Resources Loaded

8.4 sec

Page Rendered

3.6 sec

ntmg.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ntmg content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ntmg.com

Guest Experience Platform for Attractions and Experience

Visit ntmg.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ntmg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 33 ms and then it took 12 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ntmg.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

89/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.185

66/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.4 s

49/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nutmeg.io

33 ms

nutmeg.io

676 ms

gtm.js

59 ms

css2

33 ms

styles.min.css

685 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Ntmg.com, 16% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.6 sec) relates to the external source Nutmeg.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 484.6 kB (4%)

Content Size

11.3 MB

After Optimization

10.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ntmg.com main page is 11.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 11.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 33.4 kB

  • Original 38.9 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.9 kB, which is 46% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 447.7 kB

  • Original 11.2 MB
  • After minification 10.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ntmg images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 4.6 kB
  • After minification 4.6 kB
  • After compression 1.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 3.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 6.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (24%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

34

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ntmg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

nutmeg.io

nutmeg.io

33 ms

nutmeg.io

nutmeg.io

676 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

59 ms

css2

css2

33 ms

styles.min.css

styles.min.css

685 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

19 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

21 ms

script.js

script.js

523 ms

new_logo.png

new_logo.png

60 ms

section1_main.png

section1_main.png

62 ms

section2_bg.svg

section2_bg.svg

263 ms

section2_pic3.png

section2_pic3.png

929 ms

section2_pic8.png

section2_pic8.png

902 ms

section2_pic9.png

section2_pic9.png

1117 ms

section2_pic1.png

section2_pic1.png

63 ms

section2_pic5.png

section2_pic5.png

904 ms

section3_bg.svg

section3_bg.svg

511 ms

section3_pic1.png

section3_pic1.png

1728 ms

ic_pin.svg

ic_pin.svg

949 ms

section3_pic2.png

section3_pic2.png

3984 ms

section3_pic3.png

section3_pic3.png

2777 ms

section4_bg.svg

section4_bg.svg

1386 ms

section5_ic1_black.svg

section5_ic1_black.svg

1415 ms

section5_ic2_black.svg

section5_ic2_black.svg

1574 ms

section5_ic3_black.svg

section5_ic3_black.svg

1839 ms

section5_ic4_black.svg

section5_ic4_black.svg

1659 ms

section5_ic5_black.svg

section5_ic5_black.svg

2026 ms

section5_ic6_black.svg

section5_ic6_black.svg

2107 ms

ic_check.svg

ic_check.svg

2180 ms

section5_pic1.png

section5_pic1.png

3115 ms

section5_pic2.png

section5_pic2.png

3299 ms

section5_pic3.png

section5_pic3.png

3369 ms

section5_pic4.png

section5_pic4.png

3480 ms

section5_pic5.png

section5_pic5.png

4057 ms

section5_pic6.png

section5_pic6.png

4377 ms

section6_bg.svg

section6_bg.svg

3755 ms

section6_pic1.png

section6_pic1.png

5995 ms

section6_pic2.png

section6_pic2.png

5980 ms

section6_pic3.png

section6_pic3.png

5236 ms

section6_pic4.png

section6_pic4.png

5475 ms

section6_pic5.png

section6_pic5.png

5554 ms

section6_pic6.png

section6_pic6.png

6636 ms

section7_bg.svg

section7_bg.svg

5753 ms

section7_pic1.svg

section7_pic1.svg

5879 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZs.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZs.woff

27 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZs.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZs.woff

46 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZs.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZs.woff

65 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfMZs.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfMZs.woff

66 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeMZs.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeMZs.woff

67 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZs.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZs.woff

68 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZs.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZs.woff

67 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYMZs.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYMZs.woff

64 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYMZs.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYMZs.woff

66 ms

PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA

PAJJhLM6sSoWKfWCAAwDAjgbRAAB42mNgYGBkAIIbCZo5IPrmUn0hGA0AO8EFTQAA

0 ms

section7_pic2.svg

section7_pic2.svg

6009 ms

section7_pic3.svg

section7_pic3.svg

6149 ms

section10_bg.svg

section10_bg.svg

6312 ms

Accessibility Review

ntmg.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

ntmg.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ntmg.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ntmg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ntmg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ntmg.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ntmg. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: