8.2 sec in total
1.7 sec
6.1 sec
475 ms
Click here to check amazing Nutrilicious content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about nutrilicious.co.uk
Food nutrition and healthcare communication professionals, experts in consumer engagement, events, PR, thought leadership and media
Visit nutrilicious.co.ukWe analyzed Nutrilicious.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
nutrilicious.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value13.1 s
0/100
25%
Value10.6 s
7/100
10%
Value2,100 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.278
44/100
15%
Value14.6 s
8/100
10%
1684 ms
246 ms
433 ms
26 ms
326 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Nutrilicious.co.uk, 17% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Nutrilicious.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 285.5 kB (11%)
2.7 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Nutrilicious.co.uk main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 168.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 168.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nutrilicious images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 46.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 17.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nutrilicious.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.1 kB or 28% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (70%)
61
18
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nutrilicious. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
nutrilicious.co.uk
1684 ms
styles.css
246 ms
sfsi-style.css
433 ms
css
26 ms
generic-no-float.min.css
326 ms
css
22 ms
style.css
222 ms
front.min.css
249 ms
style.css
315 ms
front.min.js
327 ms
si_captcha.js
328 ms
js
81 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
333 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
364 ms
jquery.min.js
553 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
446 ms
sslnonce.js
441 ms
index.js
440 ms
index.js
446 ms
core.min.js
492 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
553 ms
jquery.shuffle.min.js
555 ms
random-shuffle-min.js
556 ms
custom.js
580 ms
scripts.min.js
768 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
670 ms
jquery.mobile.js
679 ms
easypiechart.js
673 ms
salvattore.js
673 ms
common.js
694 ms
api.js
48 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
789 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
792 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
890 ms
index.js
793 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
981 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
883 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
898 ms
js
74 ms
lazyload.min.js
978 ms
style.css
598 ms
contactbackground.jpg
789 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf
47 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf
75 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf
84 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf
89 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf
89 ms
modules.woff
219 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpfBJ.ttf
89 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyovBJ.ttf
89 ms
ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsovBJ.ttf
87 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkaVc.ttf
93 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkaVc.ttf
99 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjaVc.ttf
98 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjaVc.ttf
94 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjaVc.ttf
97 ms
sdk.js
40 ms
et-divi-dynamic-1855-late.css
137 ms
sdk.js
8 ms
recaptcha__en.js
52 ms
artichoke.jpg
347 ms
chanterelles.jpg
351 ms
fig.jpg
368 ms
redcabbage.jpg
362 ms
watermelon.jpg
270 ms
slide6bw.jpg
432 ms
orange.jpg
958 ms
panel4.png
357 ms
NL-Transparent-Green-logo.png
367 ms
Icon-1.2.png
377 ms
Untitled-design-10.png
366 ms
Icon-1.3.png
450 ms
Untitled-design-13-400x250.jpg
520 ms
Eatwell-Guide-400x250.png
842 ms
Insights-blog-header-1200x600-1-400x250.png
733 ms
style.min.css
125 ms
nutrilicious.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
nutrilicious.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
nutrilicious.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nutrilicious.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nutrilicious.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nutrilicious.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nutrilicious. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: