2.2 sec in total
303 ms
1.7 sec
216 ms
Click here to check amazing Nutritionalsciences content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about nutritionalsciences.com
Buy a domain and see how a premium domain can be the best investment. Your business starts here. Buy a domain today.
Visit nutritionalsciences.comWe analyzed Nutritionalsciences.com page load time and found that the first response time was 303 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
nutritionalsciences.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
87/100
10%
Value3.3 s
69/100
25%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
Value60 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.4 s
98/100
10%
303 ms
237 ms
61 ms
35 ms
58 ms
Our browser made a total of 126 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Nutritionalsciences.com, 10% (12 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 6% (7 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (438 ms) relates to the external source Staticxx.facebook.com.
Page size can be reduced by 692.3 kB (68%)
1.0 MB
330.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Nutritionalsciences.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 775.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.7 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Nutritionalsciences needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 504.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 504.1 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 150.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nutritionalsciences.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 150.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 77 (76%)
101
24
The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nutritionalsciences. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
nutritionalsciences.com
303 ms
monetate.js
237 ms
application.css
61 ms
ng-modal.css
35 ms
angular.min.js
58 ms
ng-modal.js
34 ms
google_analytics.js
34 ms
google_oauth.js
33 ms
bold_chat.js
49 ms
eloqua.js
49 ms
hotjar.js
48 ms
adroll.js
47 ms
impactRadius.js
52 ms
in.js
132 ms
api.js
68 ms
api:client.js
126 ms
app.js
48 ms
cookies.js
47 ms
socialMedia.js
45 ms
countryDropdown.js
50 ms
monetate.js
47 ms
index.js
49 ms
lander.js
47 ms
seoPages.js
56 ms
sitePages.js
50 ms
search.js
51 ms
modal.js
55 ms
forms.js
54 ms
tldSelector.js
54 ms
setFixedTop.js
57 ms
searchBar.js
57 ms
currency.js
59 ms
trust.js
59 ms
conversion.js
47 ms
lander-v2.css
58 ms
tdfs-inner.css
57 ms
tdfs-temp.css
62 ms
thankyou.css
61 ms
entry.js
10 ms
css
27 ms
fontawesome.min.css
11 ms
bd-icons.min.css
10 ms
ga.js
25 ms
foundation-A136666-2811-40ba-bff2-3df3af8bc2ae1.min.js
67 ms
userspace
363 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
72 ms
recaptcha__en.js
376 ms
all.js
437 ms
360 ms
ss-social-regular.css
50 ms
css
49 ms
logo-header-2x.png
40 ms
__utm.gif
313 ms
__utm.gif
297 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
188 ms
266 ms
hotjar-10205.js
169 ms
elqCfg.min.js
152 ms
foundation-tags-SD780-3f5b-4f28-957f-6e6dc25a7fc41.min.js
128 ms
postmessageRelay
165 ms
__utm.gif
34 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
38 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
85 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
106 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
106 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
77 ms
svrGP
219 ms
svrGP
161 ms
iframe
193 ms
modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js
150 ms
collect
149 ms
framework
141 ms
71 ms
fallback
87 ms
144 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
62 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
60 ms
svrGP.aspx
59 ms
fallback__ltr.css
49 ms
payload
47 ms
xd_arbiter.php
213 ms
xd_arbiter.php
438 ms
1233565733-idpiframe.js
22 ms
css
70 ms
svrGP.aspx
50 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
23 ms
iframerpc
23 ms
logo_48.png
5 ms
refresh.png
10 ms
audio.png
16 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
25 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
29 ms
vms.js
82 ms
roundtrip.js
7 ms
visit-data
204 ms
6ESKICLQUVAGDN5NI2ETS4.js
118 ms
xd_arbiter.php
155 ms
bc.pv
88 ms
fbevents.hashing.js
89 ms
out
12 ms
38 ms
8 ms
23 ms
out
11 ms
out
22 ms
out
22 ms
out
21 ms
out
20 ms
out
20 ms
out
31 ms
out
31 ms
37 ms
u.php
71 ms
adsct
118 ms
24 ms
pixel
60 ms
377928.gif
14 ms
bounce
35 ms
sd
15 ms
sync
54 ms
u.php
56 ms
u.php
82 ms
u.php
81 ms
tap.php
20 ms
56 ms
in
5 ms
nutritionalsciences.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
nutritionalsciences.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
nutritionalsciences.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nutritionalsciences.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Nutritionalsciences.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nutritionalsciences.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nutritionalsciences. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: