Tools & Wizards About Us
nutritionpool.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

nutritionpool.com

Nutrition Pool - A Complete Nutritional Health Blog

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

141 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

475 ms

nutritionpool.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Nutrition Pool content for Morocco. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about nutritionpool.com

Welcome to Nutrition Pool, an educative nutritional blog where you get the latest nutritional tips & free ebooks on fitness, weight loss & healthy living in general Nutrition Pool is jointly owned by ...

Visit nutritionpool.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nutritionpool.com page load time and found that the first response time was 141 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nutritionpool.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,460 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.716

7/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.5 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nutritionpool.com

141 ms

nutritionpool.com

337 ms

autoptimize_3a4b7638474ea43e5a08327b8c33a113.css

258 ms

jquery.js

465 ms

js

97 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Nutritionpool.com, 10% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 10% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (465 ms) belongs to the original domain Nutritionpool.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 120.1 kB (26%)

Content Size

459.1 kB

After Optimization

339.0 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Nutritionpool.com main page is 459.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 299.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 63.5 kB

  • Original 79.4 kB
  • After minification 79.4 kB
  • After compression 15.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 45.8 kB

  • Original 299.2 kB
  • After minification 299.2 kB
  • After compression 253.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 45.8 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

  • Original 80.4 kB
  • After minification 80.4 kB
  • After compression 69.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nutritionpool.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.8 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (79%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

4

  • AJAX
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nutrition Pool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

nutritionpool.com

nutritionpool.com

141 ms

nutritionpool.com

nutritionpool.com

337 ms

autoptimize_3a4b7638474ea43e5a08327b8c33a113.css

autoptimize_3a4b7638474ea43e5a08327b8c33a113.css

258 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

465 ms

js

js

97 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

216 ms

autoptimize_single_3745d97e3f5618ffd6ac8e7f916fca42.js

autoptimize_single_3745d97e3f5618ffd6ac8e7f916fca42.js

401 ms

autoptimize_dd0b310fbcbb7137778cb2f54e7c2b72.js

autoptimize_dd0b310fbcbb7137778cb2f54e7c2b72.js

397 ms

twemoji.js

twemoji.js

66 ms

wp-emoji.js

wp-emoji.js

132 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

323 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

81 ms

js

js

82 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

60 ms

autoptimize_single_456c02ee2a496580a24e5aee614ba9b3.js

autoptimize_single_456c02ee2a496580a24e5aee614ba9b3.js

93 ms

wp-polyfill-dom-rect.js

wp-polyfill-dom-rect.js

93 ms

wp-polyfill-url.js

wp-polyfill-url.js

136 ms

wp-polyfill-formdata.js

wp-polyfill-formdata.js

91 ms

wp-polyfill-element-closest.js

wp-polyfill-element-closest.js

93 ms

collect

collect

65 ms

picturefill.min.js

picturefill.min.js

67 ms

Accessibility Review

nutritionpool.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

nutritionpool.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

nutritionpool.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nutritionpool.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nutritionpool.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

nutritionpool.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nutrition Pool. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: