Tools & Wizards About Us
old.newoldstamp.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 72

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

old.newoldstamp.com

Email Signature Generator with Signature Templates - NEWOLDSTAMP

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

315 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

old.newoldstamp.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Old NEWOLDSTAMP content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about old.newoldstamp.com

Create and manage email signatures with NEWOLDSTAMP’s email signature generator. Customize email signature templates according to your branding.

Visit old.newoldstamp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Old.newoldstamp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 315 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

old.newoldstamp.com performance score

72

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

93/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value720 ms

41/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.05

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.2 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

old.newoldstamp.com

315 ms

newoldstamp.com

496 ms

gtm.js

123 ms

v4-62e929a67c83fbc54b18207cbb8661298da2b617cb678d3d54c34c8247f607bd.css

22 ms

logo-v4.svg

60 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Old.newoldstamp.com, 88% (71 requests) were made to Newoldstamp.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (496 ms) relates to the external source Newoldstamp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 61.5 kB (32%)

Content Size

193.6 kB

After Optimization

132.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Old.newoldstamp.com main page is 193.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 75.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 61.1 kB

  • Original 75.0 kB
  • After minification 75.0 kB
  • After compression 13.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 272 B

  • Original 46.3 kB
  • After minification 46.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Old NEWOLDSTAMP images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 106 B

  • Original 53.0 kB
  • After minification 53.0 kB
  • After compression 52.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 19.2 kB
  • After minification 19.2 kB
  • After compression 19.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Old.newoldstamp.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (19%)

Requests Now

78

After Optimization

63

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Old NEWOLDSTAMP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

old.newoldstamp.com

old.newoldstamp.com

315 ms

newoldstamp.com

newoldstamp.com

496 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

123 ms

v4-62e929a67c83fbc54b18207cbb8661298da2b617cb678d3d54c34c8247f607bd.css

v4-62e929a67c83fbc54b18207cbb8661298da2b617cb678d3d54c34c8247f607bd.css

22 ms

logo-v4.svg

logo-v4.svg

60 ms

icons.svg

icons.svg

70 ms

email-icon1.png

email-icon1.png

67 ms

email-icon2.png

email-icon2.png

164 ms

email-icon3.png

email-icon3.png

73 ms

email-icon4.png

email-icon4.png

72 ms

email-icon5.png

email-icon5.png

69 ms

email-icon6.png

email-icon6.png

75 ms

email-icon7.png

email-icon7.png

80 ms

email-icon8.png

email-icon8.png

81 ms

email-icon9.png

email-icon9.png

76 ms

email-icon10.png

email-icon10.png

75 ms

email-icon11.png

email-icon11.png

84 ms

email-icon12.png

email-icon12.png

83 ms

automate-company-email-signatures-x1.webp

automate-company-email-signatures-x1.webp

85 ms

forbes.svg

forbes.svg

87 ms

themuse.svg

themuse.svg

88 ms

marketing-land.svg

marketing-land.svg

93 ms

yesware.svg

yesware.svg

90 ms

geek.svg

geek.svg

94 ms

template-monster.svg

template-monster.svg

96 ms

capterra.svg

capterra.svg

98 ms

g2.svg

g2.svg

99 ms

create-custom-email-signatures-your-brand-x1.webp

create-custom-email-signatures-your-brand-x1.webp

104 ms

v4-f8d7da7cd1d0e4c612863e5bb409de2259dabc13f65847b65cd16e8cb78dff32.js

v4-f8d7da7cd1d0e4c612863e5bb409de2259dabc13f65847b65cd16e8cb78dff32.js

101 ms

make-an-email-signature-minutes-x1.webp

make-an-email-signature-minutes-x1.webp

96 ms

creating-email-signatures-your-team-easy-x1.webp

creating-email-signatures-your-team-easy-x1.webp

99 ms

corporate-email-signature-generator-advanced-features-x1.webp

corporate-email-signature-generator-advanced-features-x1.webp

196 ms

keep-email-signature-updated-online-generator-x1.webp

keep-email-signature-updated-online-generator-x1.webp

135 ms

deploy-email-signature-updates-newoldstamp-x1.webp

deploy-email-signature-updates-newoldstamp-x1.webp

199 ms

lyft.svg

lyft.svg

136 ms

loreal.svg

loreal.svg

138 ms

nvidia.svg

nvidia.svg

139 ms

leger.svg

leger.svg

138 ms

go-daddy.svg

go-daddy.svg

141 ms

vodafone.svg

vodafone.svg

102 ms

nestle.svg

nestle.svg

102 ms

fedex.svg

fedex.svg

90 ms

at&t.svg

at&t.svg

87 ms

ericsson.svg

ericsson.svg

118 ms

sky.svg

sky.svg

119 ms

game-loft.svg

game-loft.svg

119 ms

starbucks.svg

starbucks.svg

120 ms

capterra-review.png

capterra-review.png

119 ms

g2-review.png

g2-review.png

120 ms

rating-starts.png

rating-starts.png

118 ms

capterra.png

capterra.png

117 ms

g2.png

g2.png

113 ms

jessica-belivea.png

jessica-belivea.png

114 ms

anthony-cotter.webp

anthony-cotter.webp

112 ms

annie-beckius.webp

annie-beckius.webp

110 ms

suren-arora.png

suren-arora.png

112 ms

email-signature-banner-campaigns-x1.webp

email-signature-banner-campaigns-x1.webp

108 ms

supercharge-sales-funnel-with-campaigns-x1.webp

supercharge-sales-funnel-with-campaigns-x1.webp

106 ms

online-email-signature-generator-x1.gif

online-email-signature-generator-x1.gif

105 ms

run-email-signature-campaigns-x1.webp

run-email-signature-campaigns-x1.webp

108 ms

tool-creating-signature-automatically-newoldstamp-x1.webp

tool-creating-signature-automatically-newoldstamp-x1.webp

108 ms

choose-template-create-new-email-signature-x1.webp

choose-template-create-new-email-signature-x1.webp

106 ms

live-preview-in-email-signature-editor-x1.webp

live-preview-in-email-signature-editor-x1.webp

101 ms

add-email-signature-few-simple-clicks-x1.webp

add-email-signature-few-simple-clicks-x1.webp

108 ms

add-social-icons-signatures-online-generator-x1.webp

add-social-icons-signatures-online-generator-x1.webp

107 ms

email-signature-in-outlook-gmail-apple-mail-x1.webp

email-signature-in-outlook-gmail-apple-mail-x1.webp

215 ms

icon-gmail.png

icon-gmail.png

70 ms

icon-g-suite.png

icon-g-suite.png

69 ms

icon-outlook.png

icon-outlook.png

67 ms

icon-exchange.png

icon-exchange.png

143 ms

icon-microsoft-365.png

icon-microsoft-365.png

141 ms

icon-apple-mail.png

icon-apple-mail.png

138 ms

logo-BPG.svg

logo-BPG.svg

136 ms

js

js

44 ms

hotjar-957662.js

hotjar-957662.js

147 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

113 ms

api.min.js

api.min.js

144 ms

1e9b048f

1e9b048f

141 ms

153 ms

modules.84f80a92c39bbd76564a.js

modules.84f80a92c39bbd76564a.js

25 ms

cs

cs

284 ms

Accessibility Review

old.newoldstamp.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

old.newoldstamp.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

old.newoldstamp.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Old.newoldstamp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Old.newoldstamp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

old.newoldstamp.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Old NEWOLDSTAMP. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: